Martin Gränicher
My feedback
16 results found
-
38 votesMartin Gränicher supported this idea ·
-
79 votesMartin Gränicher supported this idea ·
-
33 votesMartin Gränicher shared this idea ·
-
72 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Martin Gränicher shared this idea · -
92 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Martin Gränicher commentedIndexing of Collection items seems error prone in general; we have several cases where the same record shows up twice or three times in the same collection in Collection lobby.
Martin Gränicher supported this idea · -
81 votesMartin Gränicher supported this idea ·
-
162 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Martin Gränicher commentedWith a custom XSL added - which the cloud app allows - the records can be printed in MARC formats with all fields, subfields and indicators.
Nevertheless, an integrated solution which does not necessitate the use of an 'add-on' is much welcome!
Thanks!Martin Gränicher supported this idea · -
50 votesMartin Gränicher supported this idea ·
-
71 votesMartin Gränicher supported this idea ·
-
73 votesMartin Gränicher supported this idea ·
-
287 votes
Dear community, this idea was reviewed and accepted, below you can find the suggested design, please feel free to comment if you have further suggestion:
1. It will be possible to sort the interested users list using arrows. The hold requests will be activated as per the order in the interested users tab.
2. A check mark for ‘Loan to first interested user’ will cause the received item to be automatically loaned to the first interested user when the item is received.
3. It will be possible to print the list of users (in the proper order) when the item is received
Thanks,
Noam Fass | Alma product management teamAn error occurred while saving the comment Martin Gränicher commentedPretty please, make the Interested User fields searchable! How else would one be able to remove a User from all PO lines when they leave the institution?
-
71 votesMartin Gränicher supported this idea ·
-
139 votesMartin Gränicher supported this idea ·
-
44 votesMartin Gränicher supported this idea ·
-
303 votesMartin Gränicher supported this idea ·
-
64 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Martin Gränicher commentedThank you for posting this idea, April.
What I would expect the system to do is to either
- hide the service from all users that are not logged in as soon as a rule hides it from a single user group or
- offer administrators the possibility to hide the service from all users which have no user group (i.e. which are not logged in).Martin Gränicher supported this idea ·
With the 'Identifier' field, which we use to register POL-specific shipping addresses, not being readily editable anymore, this request becomes more urgent.