Kirsti Thomas

My feedback

  1. 114 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Kirsti Thomas supported this idea  · 
  2. 147 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    Kirsti Thomas supported this idea  · 
  3. 364 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    Kirsti Thomas supported this idea  · 
  4. 31 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Kirsti Thomas supported this idea  · 
  5. 97 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Kirsti Thomas supported this idea  · 
  6. 85 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Kirsti Thomas supported this idea  · 
  7. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Kirsti Thomas shared this idea  · 
  8. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kirsti Thomas commented  · 

    FYI, Ex Libris says they have "no standard protocol for the order that 035 data is read into the Network Number field." For most customers, Ex Libris has read OCLC numbers into the Network Number field from top to bottom of the MARC record. For other customers (like us), they've read in numbers from the bottom to the top of the MARC record. This is unacceptable.

  9. 168 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Kirsti Thomas supported this idea  · 
  10. 103 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Kirsti Thomas supported this idea  · 
  11. 84 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Kirsti Thomas supported this idea  · 
  12. 114 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Kirsti Thomas supported this idea  · 
  13. 99 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Kirsti Thomas shared this idea  · 
  14. 59 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Kirsti Thomas supported this idea  · 
  15. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Kirsti Thomas supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base