Dominik Bláha, SLSP
My feedback
37 results found
-
14 votes
Dominik Bláha, SLSP
supported this idea
·
-
104 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Dominik Bláha, SLSP
shared this idea
·
-
59 votes
AdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Dominik Bláha, SLSP
supported this idea
·
-
85 votes
Dominik Bláha, SLSP
supported this idea
·
Dominik Bláha, SLSP
shared this idea
·
-
144 votes
Dominik Bláha, SLSP
supported this idea
·
-
56 votes
Thank you for posting this idea. We are checking the option to enhance Database Search scope to include also e-collections that are available for all not only for the specific IZ.
Dominik Bláha, SLSP
shared this idea
·
-
128 votes
Dominik Bláha, SLSP
shared this idea
·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Dominik Bláha, SLSP
commented
Dear Kasper,
we have the same issue with our openURL links. In the Ex Libris Support ticket for this they gave us deadline to fix this bug in November 2022.
Best regards,
Dominik -
18 votes
Dominik Bláha, SLSP
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Dominik Bláha, SLSP
commented
We encountered this discrepancy as well. It is happening only for the CZ linked portfolios.
Everywhere else in Alma (Electronic Portfolio Advanced Search index Material Type or viewing the portfolio in Search), the correct logic is applied for these two fields "...the value in the Electronic material type parameter overrides the material type specified in the Electronic material type originating from Bib parameter." The same logic should be applied also in the Service Editor.This is an issue because the field "Electronic material type originating from Bib" is controlled by Ex Libris in the CZ and the IZs cannot change this value. Even if the value in the field is "-", you will see the "-" in the Service editor no matter what you do.
-
43 votes
Dominik Bláha, SLSP
supported this idea
·
-
45 votes
Dominik Bláha, SLSP
supported this idea
·
-
51 votes
Dominik Bláha, SLSP
supported this idea
·
-
90 votes
Dominik Bláha, SLSP
supported this idea
·
-
110 votes
Dominik Bláha, SLSP
shared this idea
·
-
144 votes
Dominik Bláha, SLSP
supported this idea
·
-
28 votes
Dominik Bláha, SLSP
supported this idea
·
-
31 votes
Dominik Bláha, SLSP
supported this idea
·
Dear Ingrid and James,
in our network, I can now see the coverage and licence labels for Network Services being translated correctly. It might have been fixed in the meantime. Can you confirm this also in your environment?