Line Eidstø
My feedback
19 results found
-
139 votes
Line Eidstø supported this idea ·
-
23 votes
Line Eidstø supported this idea ·
-
14 votes
Line Eidstø supported this idea ·
-
20 votes
Line Eidstø supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
287 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Line Eidstø commented
We are also experiencing this as a problem. Each time we create predicted items we need to use "run a job" or the cloud app "multiple item edit" to generate a new description for the predicted items. This takes a lot of time, and seems unnecessarily complicated. In our configuration, under resources - general - description templates, the logic for how the description should look has been created. This logic should be used when creating the predicted items.
Line Eidstø supported this idea ·
-
28 votes
Line Eidstø supported this idea ·
Line Eidstø shared this idea ·
-
13 votes
Line Eidstø shared this idea ·
-
21 votes
Line Eidstø shared this idea ·
-
32 votes
Line Eidstø supported this idea ·
Line Eidstø shared this idea ·
-
12 votes
Line Eidstø shared this idea ·
-
48 votes
Line Eidstø supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
Line Eidstø shared this idea ·
-
18 votes
Line Eidstø supported this idea ·
Line Eidstø shared this idea ·
-
18 votes
Line Eidstø supported this idea ·
Line Eidstø shared this idea ·
-
533 votes
Dear community, as part of the ongoing UX improvements in Alma, the "Receive new material" screen (aka Receiving WB) is planned to be refactored and support the need described in this idea. For more information see Alma roadmap:
Thanks,
Noam Fass | Alma product team
An error occurred while saving the comment Line Eidstø commented
Great news that this suggestion has been accepted! This would be a great improvement to our workflow and would mean a lot less clicking and going between different screens. Like Lindsay commented I could not find this in the roadmap you linked to, I hope this improvement will be included.
Line Eidstø supported this idea ·
-
417 votes
Line Eidstø supported this idea ·
-
34 votes
Line Eidstø supported this idea ·
-
22 votes
Line Eidstø supported this idea ·
-
100 votes
Line Eidstø supported this idea ·
It would still be practical for the POL to link to the receiving workbench, especially for periodicals. For continuous orders only items in claim are possible to receive directly on the POL, in addition it is not practical to use the POL to receive periodicals when there are a lot of issues. In some instances for monographs it is not practical to use the new option for receiving in the POL, in regards to f example printing barcodes and additional functionality which is only available in the receiving workbench. A link from the POL to the receiving workbench would in these instances be a good option.