Skip to content

Line Eidstø

My feedback

19 results found

  1. 23 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Line Eidstø supported this idea  · 
  2. 14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Line Eidstø supported this idea  · 
  3. 20 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Line Eidstø supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Line Eidstø commented  · 

    It would still be practical for the POL to link to the receiving workbench, especially for periodicals. For continuous orders only items in claim are possible to receive directly on the POL, in addition it is not practical to use the POL to receive periodicals when there are a lot of issues. In some instances for monographs it is not practical to use the new option for receiving in the POL, in regards to f example printing barcodes and additional functionality which is only available in the receiving workbench. A link from the POL to the receiving workbench would in these instances be a good option.

  4. 186 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Line Eidstø supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Line Eidstø commented  · 

    This is a good idea. We also need the fields reclaim interval and subscription interval added to the job "Update PO lines information", Claiming grace is available today in this job and is found in the same secton of the POL as the fields mentioned above. It seems illogical that only claiming grace can be changed in the job.

  5. 287 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Line Eidstø commented  · 

    We are also experiencing this as a problem. Each time we create predicted items we need to use "run a job" or the cloud app "multiple item edit" to generate a new description for the predicted items. This takes a lot of time, and seems unnecessarily complicated. In our configuration, under resources - general - description templates, the logic for how the description should look has been created. This logic should be used when creating the predicted items.

    Line Eidstø supported this idea  · 
  6. 28 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Line Eidstø supported this idea  · 
    Line Eidstø shared this idea  · 
  7. 13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Line Eidstø shared this idea  · 
  8. 21 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Line Eidstø shared this idea  · 
  9. 29 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Line Eidstø supported this idea  · 
    Line Eidstø shared this idea  · 
  10. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Line Eidstø shared this idea  · 
  11. 45 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Line Eidstø supported this idea  · 
  12. 8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Line Eidstø shared this idea  · 
  13. 18 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Line Eidstø supported this idea  · 
    Line Eidstø shared this idea  · 
  14. 18 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Line Eidstø supported this idea  · 
    Line Eidstø shared this idea  · 
  15. 533 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Dear community, as part of the ongoing UX improvements in Alma, the "Receive new material" screen (aka Receiving WB) is planned to be refactored and support the need described in this idea. For more information see Alma roadmap:

    https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Materials/010Roadmap/Alma_Roadmap_Highlights_(2022-2024)_-_July_2022_Update/Acquisitions#Receiving_Workbench_-_Enhanced_UX


    Thanks,

    Noam Fass | Alma product team

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Line Eidstø commented  · 

    Great news that this suggestion has been accepted! This would be a great improvement to our workflow and would mean a lot less clicking and going between different screens. Like Lindsay commented I could not find this in the roadmap you linked to, I hope this improvement will be included.

    Line Eidstø supported this idea  · 
  16. 416 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Line Eidstø supported this idea  · 
  17. 34 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Line Eidstø supported this idea  · 
  18. 22 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Line Eidstø supported this idea  · 
  19. 100 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Line Eidstø supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base