Skip to content

Rosetta

Your feedback matters to us. Help us improve Rosetta by telling us what you’d like to see using the message areas below. You can also can support something already posted.

We would love to be able to respond to every idea that is submitted, but this is not feasible. We are, however, committed to responding to the most popular ideas—those that have received the most points.

For more information please review our FAQ and guidelines. Thank you.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

439 results found

  1. Events for DNX Validation

    with version 6.0 DNX validation was introduced for METS deposits and any AIP update. Furthermore the .xsd will be versioned. As for now I cannot find any event describing the validation process, the name and version of .xsd used for validation, the agent, the event outcome (success). I would appreciate events documenting this validation. In my opinion this is worth a provenance event, like file format identification event 25.

    5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Eggy Car Game

    Eggy Car is such a fun little time killer. I started playing it during a break and ended up losing track of time completely. There's something oddly satisfying about trying to drive carefully while protecting that fragile egg — it’s like calming chaos. Definitely didn’t expect to enjoy it this much!

    5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Deactivate Institution

    Enable deleting an institution that had content already deposited into it. This should be enabled only if all the IEs were already deleted.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Adi Alter responded

    Submitted by Ex Libris PM on behalf of our customers

  4. IIIF Universal Viewer - Share Options

    Would like to configure the ‘Share’ option.
    At this stage the only share options are
    1. Embed
    2. URL link
    Would like to configure the ‘Share’ option to allow adding the following additional social media options
    1. Facebook
    2. Twitter
    3. LinkedIn
    4. Various citation options such as RefWorks

    As part of the share option we would like to configure what information is passed across. For example, for Twitter, SLQ would like to pass
    1. Handle/PI information
    2. Title
    3. Image
    4. Any appropriate hashtags

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Assigning a valid SSO user to a default account if one does not exist

    We do not wish to have all of our institutional users in Rosetta, leaving that for administrators and publishers.

    When a user has signed in successfully through SSO (in our case ADFS) we know that they are from our institution, so we should be able to do access rights rules based on this.

    We are also able to pass through extra parameters through SAML to identify the type of user, and where they have come from, it would be great to be able to assign such users to basic user accounts so we can have granular access rights to IE's…

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Material flow simplification by making things optional

    Currently the material flow combines amongst others, a restrictive list of access rights, retention policies and metadata fields. These operate as restrictions on which access rights, retention policies and metadata fields can be supplied by the submitter. We suggest to make it possible to opt-out on any of these restrictions. That would benefit customers that have automated submission workflows outside of Rosetta where the metadata is already checked for validity and fully under control. It would also help solving human errors when new ARs are created, but forgotten to be added to their respective material flows. If it not possible…

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Deposit  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Add "View Migrated Objects" to Preservation Executions History

    as a preservation manager I would appreciate to find the history of the execution of signed-off preservation plans in one place. Therefore it would be helpful to have the list of migrated IEs ( the report of event 355 - Representation was added by preservation plan) in Preservation/Preservation Executions/Signed-off Plans/Executions History/Blocks History, for example as "View Migrated Objects" in addition to "View Skipped Objects".

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. IIIF Universal Viewer - Download Options - filename

    When selecting the download option would like to be able to configure the download file name.
    Currently the file name is ‘default.jpg’
    Would like to configure the download so that the download file name can use one of the following options
    1. <dc:title> (maybe the first 30 characters); or
    2. <internalIdentifierValue>
    SLQ would prefer the <dc:title> option

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Wu Tang Name Generator

    Ever wonder what your name would be in the epic saga of the Wu-Tang Clan? Our Wu Tang Name Generator is your key to entering that world. This isn't just a randomizer—it’s a deep-dive into the legendary fusion of street knowledge and Shaolin mysticism that defined an era of hip-hop.
    Inspired by the powerful aliases of RZA, Ghostface Killah, and Method Man, this tool uses an advanced AI to analyze your name and forge a complete warrior persona. It honors the tradition of finding strength and identity in a name that tells a story. When you enter your name, you…

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Deposit  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Publishing Sync Job - View Log

    hen running a Publishing Sync Job and looking at the assciated 'View' we get the following information

    Mon Jan 07 09:06:40 AEST 2019 INFO sync all configurations for IE publishing
    Mon Jan 07 09:06:40 AEST 2019 INFO sync the configurationId: 18981614
    Mon Jan 07 09:06:41 AEST 2019 INFO sync the profileId: 18981613
    Mon Jan 07 09:06:41 AEST 2019 INFO Handling new IEs
    Mon Jan 07 09:06:41 AEST 2019 INFO Handling Removed IEs
    Mon Jan 07 09:06:41 AEST 2019 INFO Handling updated IEs
    Mon Jan 07 09:06:41 AEST 2019 INFO Finished sync for the profileId: 18981613
    Mon Jan 07 09:06:41 AEST…

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Profiles for Rosetta-Aleph-Integration

    we are using the Rosetta-Aleph-Integration in both directions:
    1. creating the CMS-record in Rosetta and
    2. setting the Rosetta-flag in Aleph as well as updating the Aleph record with the URN created in Rosetta.
    In the past there was only one target field for the URN and the assignCMS task with updateURNTask worked without problems.

    Due to changes in the cataloging rules - we are using now the international RDA-rules - we have to deal now with different target fields in Aleph for the URN depending on the type of material: e-only e-books, digital reproductions of printed books, online versions…

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. IIIF Universal Viewer - Download Options

    Would like the ability to configure the download options to allow the download the Master Preservation Master

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. IIIF Universal Viewer - Searchable PDF

    For searchable PDFs would like the viewer to have similar features as the viewer deployed by the British Library- http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_00000004216E#?c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=0&xywh=-2194%2C-163%2C6568%2C3244

    Would like the search bar for be available and indication where the search word if located in the PDF

    Download options would be driven by Entity Type

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. IIIF Universal Viewer - Print

    Require the option to allow ‘Print’ from the viewer.

    Would like to configure the at least the following information as part of the ‘Print’ option

    1. Descriptive metadata
    2. Handle / PI identifier

    For images would like to print the single image to fit across the page – this is relevant if printing in portrait or landscape mode
    Allow image to scale according to paper size selected

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. IIIF Universal Viewer - delivery of Audio Visual material with Closed Captioning

    It would be good if the Rosetta IIIF Universal Viewer maintained the same functionality level as the Alma-Digital IIIF Universal Viewer.

    The Rosetta Universal Viewer in V8.2.0 is at v31.1.

    When attempting to deliver a times based item (e.g. audio visual) the following is missing

    1. skip forward and back 20 seconds
    2. access to the VTT closed captioning

    Lack of access to the CC is a major accessibility issue

    Surprisingly Alma-Digital does cater for the above

    i have attached a comparison document

    As both teams are now under 'Discovery and Digital Solutions' I would have expected the two components to maintain…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. encrypt all update channels

    After experiencing some problems with Rosetta's Format Library update mechanism (see SC 00423700 "error while updating Format Library [Rosetta 5.1.0.2]", handled by Paul), we got thinking about Rosetta updates in general. Currently, all updates are downloaded through an unencrypted connection. This includes:
    - Rosetta updates (major, minor, service packs, hotfixes) and their checksum files (!)
    - Oracle updates and their checksum files
    - PDS updates (presumably)
    - Format Library updates
    Due to this, there's no way to verify authenticity of ExLibris' servers and the integrity of the update packages/the checksums. All information that are downloaded from ExLibris' servers must be…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Take account of the METS mimetype attribute during file ingest

    The METS standard has a mimetype attribute on files "<file MIMETYPE="application/pdf" ... /> but this information is currently ignored by Rosetta during the file-type identification process on ingest.

    Mimetye should be at least as reliable as file extensions (because mimetype is a standard, is actively maintained and widely use by a good portion of software for identifying file types).

    In particular, recognising mimetypes is likely to greatly increase the ease of ingest of content from internet-facing content management systems where it is very widely used

    See also https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6838

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ingest  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Create task/job for adding/updating file-level metadata

    I know I can add file-level descriptive metadata (DC) individually to a file in the back office or use the web services to do that for many files at once, but I want to be able to add metadata to a batch of files using a process in the back office. In my case, I would be adding the same DC record to a large group of files but I can also see the need to have a different DC per file so I would send Rosetta a bunch of DC XML files - one for each file PID, similar…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Verify numbers of files in CSV and Zip match as part of CSV/Zip deposit method

    As part of the CSV/Zip deposit method, Rosetta verifies that all files in the CSV are in the Zip. It does not, however, check if all files in the Zip are listed in the CSV.

    We recently discovered that for 5 of our IEs, the CSVs were incomplete and missing a few thousand files. Even though the Zips contained more files, the deposits went through successfully and the files not listed in the CSVs were not preserved.

    I propose that as part of the deposit process, Rosetta checks the number of files in both the CSV and Zip and verify…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ingest  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. change to Rosetta METS XSD re: duplicate file IDs

    During a recent batch of deposits (see case 00477041 from the Getty for more info) we figured out that, due to an error in our one of our input files that creates the METS, our original METS file did not have unique file IDs in the structMaps for the preservation master and modified master representations. It was simply repeating the same file ID from the access file representation.

    For some reason, this did not cause a METS validation error when we validated against the Rosetta XSD before deposit, nor when it was deposited. However, it resulted in the METS in…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Deposit  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?