Anonymous
My feedback
14 results found
-
44 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
83 votesUnder Review · AdminShoshana de la Fuente (Product Manager, Esploro Repository, Ex Libris) responded
Dear Colleagues,
if the suggested solution available within analytics is not sufficient, please respond with an explanation why. Otherwise we will be closing this idea.
Thank you for your feedback,
Shoshana
Anonymous supported this idea · -
77 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
174 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
152 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
84 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
119 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
208 votes
Dear community,
Thank you for the idea. We suggest the following high level solution:
1. In Resources menu > Overlap and Collection Analysis > Compare collection analysis, it will be possible to select multiple match methods, from the existing list of match methods, and the order in which they will be used
2. The match will work as following: Try to match by method #1. If no match was found, try to match by method #2.
3. The report will include information on the matched identifier and its value
4. Similarly, in Resources menu > Overlap and Collection Analysis > Look Up Titles, it will be possible to upload an input file with multiple identifiers columns. The possible identifiers are the existing ones, and columns format will be the same as today. The difference is that it will be possible to place multiple identifier columns, in the order they should be used.
Thaks,
Tamar Fuches
Alma team
Anonymous supported this idea · -
275 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
93 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous supported this idea · -
248 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
59 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
750 votes
This improvement is planned for the 2024 Roadmap.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
212 votes
This enhancement is part of the roadmap in 2025 - with NERS #8760 - Add A-Z to Database and Journal Search in Primo VE .
Anonymous supported this idea ·
Thanks for the workaround. However, it's fiddly, time-consuming & not obvious so we'd still like improvement in this area please.