Kyle Olney

My feedback

  1. 39 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kyle Olney commented  · 

    YES! This is a no-brainer. We have to have some options available to sort the "members" of an itemized set. Title, call number, location, and status are just a few of the options that could be extremely helpful. The members of a set aren't even in the same order as they were on the file used to create the set. This makes it hard to find records!

    Kyle Olney supported this idea  · 
  2. 84 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Kyle Olney supported this idea  · 
  3. 111 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Kyle Olney supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kyle Olney commented  · 

    Our ILL department tries to give the front line circulation staff a heads-up whenever a non-home-patron will be picking up from our library. Because it doesn't happen all that frequently it can sometimes throw staff for a loop. However, as things stand currently, it is very difficult to even identify that a patron is from another institution, let alone which one.

    Patrons can also make mistakes when choosing a pickup library. If our ILL staff notice that a patron is not from our institution and also does not live locally, we will try contacting them to make sure they intended to pick up the item from us. Again, that is not easily done in this environment.

  4. 58 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Kyle Olney supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base