Lauren Gibbs
My feedback
11 results found
-
6 votes
Hello,
We will reach out to Annual Reviews, and ask for the metadata for this collection.
Thanks,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Lauren Gibbs
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Lauren Gibbs
shared this idea
·
-
12 votes
Hello,
We will reach out to ACM and ask for the metadata of this collection.
Also, I have merged this idea with the one mentioned in the comments, thank you for your attention.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
An error occurred while saving the comment
Lauren Gibbs
commented
Thanks for submitting this Genesis. I found this website explaining the changes. https://dl.acm.org/about - It looks like the CZ would need a collection for the Digital Library Basic and Digital Library Premium. We would appreciate if these could be added too.
Lauren Gibbs
supported this idea
·
-
83 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Lauren Gibbs
commented
Hello Liza,
I personally would want to have the facet show collections that are localized in our IZ whether they are activated or not. The goal would be to activate a new portfolio in a collection we already are using, so being able to filter for only localized collections would help so much. Thanks!An error occurred while saving the comment
Lauren Gibbs
commented
This would save staff so much time and searching. Please implement this.
Lauren Gibbs
supported this idea
·
-
207 votes
Hi Elizabeth, Katie, and everyone,
Thanks so much for sharing this idea!
From what I understand, it includes two main parts:
- Allowing institutions to edit the list of values in various fields, with a specific example being the “Implemented Authorization Method” field.
- Adding more fields and making them reportable in Analytics, along with a request for a flexible mechanism to support this.
Regarding the second point — adding a flexible mechanism is quite a complex change and could impact the timeline.
If you can point out around three specific fields that are most important to add first, it might be easier.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!
Thanks again,
Tamar
Lauren Gibbs
supported this idea
·
-
68 votes
Lauren Gibbs
supported this idea
·
-
51 votes
Lauren Gibbs
supported this idea
·
-
25 votes
Lauren Gibbs
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Lauren Gibbs
supported this idea
·
-
43 votes
Hi Liz,
We would like to better understand the situation of "portfolio changes vendors":
- Does this mean that the interface of the portfolio was changed?
- Is it enough to report this on collection/service level, and not in portfolio level?
- What actions would you take upon such report?
Thanks,
Tamar Fuches
Alma product team
Lauren Gibbs
supported this idea
·
-
162 votes
Lauren Gibbs
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Lauren Gibbs
commented
This would be very helpful for us as well. We recently needed to make all of our Springshare A-Z database list databases discoverable in Primo. Some of these are portfolios in Alma, so we had to add local collections to make them discoverable as databases. This complicates the management of these resources and duplicates our work. We had to add a ton of notes and link POLs so we could trace the local collection back to the actual portfolio that containes the cost, renewal, and access settings. Being able to designate a portfolio as a database so it is discoverable as a database would solve this issue for us.
Hello again,
This still has not been resolved, and we renewed our subscription. At this point we already need Annual Reviews Sciences Collection 2026 to be added. https://www.annualreviews.org/pb-assets/assets/documents/marketing/annual_reviews_pricing_catalog_2026_digital.pdf