Skip to content

Lauren Gibbs

My feedback

10 results found

  1. 82 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lauren Gibbs commented  · 

    Hello Liza,
    I personally would want to have the facet show collections that are localized in our IZ whether they are activated or not. The goal would be to activate a new portfolio in a collection we already are using, so being able to filter for only localized collections would help so much. Thanks!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lauren Gibbs commented  · 

    This would save staff so much time and searching. Please implement this.

    Lauren Gibbs supported this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Lauren Gibbs shared this idea  · 
  3. 204 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi Elizabeth, Katie, and everyone,

    Thanks so much for sharing this idea!

    From what I understand, it includes two main parts:

    1. Allowing institutions to edit the list of values in various fields, with a specific example being the “Implemented Authorization Method” field.
    2. Adding more fields and making them reportable in Analytics, along with a request for a flexible mechanism to support this.

    Regarding the second point — adding a flexible mechanism is quite a complex change and could impact the timeline.

    If you can point out around three specific fields that are most important to add first, it might be easier.

    Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!

    Thanks again,

    Tamar

    Lauren Gibbs supported this idea  · 
  4. 68 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Lauren Gibbs supported this idea  · 
  5. 50 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Lauren Gibbs supported this idea  · 
  6. 25 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Lauren Gibbs supported this idea  · 
  7. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Lauren Gibbs supported this idea  · 
  8. 43 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi Liz,

    We would like to better understand the situation of "portfolio changes vendors":

    - Does this mean that the interface of the portfolio was changed?

    - Is it enough to report this on collection/service level, and not in portfolio level?

    - What actions would you take upon such report?

    Thanks,

    Tamar Fuches

    Alma product team

    Lauren Gibbs supported this idea  · 
  9. 162 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Lauren Gibbs supported this idea  · 
  10. 47 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lauren Gibbs commented  · 

    This would be very helpful for us as well. We recently needed to make all of our Springshare A-Z database list databases discoverable in Primo. Some of these are portfolios in Alma, so we had to add local collections to make them discoverable as databases. This complicates the management of these resources and duplicates our work. We had to add a ton of notes and link POLs so we could trace the local collection back to the actual portfolio that containes the cost, renewal, and access settings. Being able to designate a portfolio as a database so it is discoverable as a database would solve this issue for us.

Feedback and Knowledge Base