Lesley Lowery

My feedback

9 results found

  1. 234 votes
    4 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Lesley Lowery supported this idea  · 
  2. 12 votes
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Lesley Lowery supported this idea  · 
  3. 17 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Lesley Lowery supported this idea  · 
  4. 406 votes
    4 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Lesley Lowery supported this idea  · 
  5. 60 votes
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Lesley Lowery supported this idea  · 
  6. 436 votes
    29 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lesley Lowery commented  · 

    This is an absolutely critical functionality needed by consortia. In addition to equipment records, consortia members frequently have IZ-only records for resources that they are contractually prohibited from sharing outside of their institutions.

    Having un-requestable resources appear in to Primo VE users in other member institutions leads to poor user experience and a glut of canceled item requests.

    I should also note that the current workaround of creating a custom local data scope where the institution = NETWORK and Inventory = available physical is incomplete at best, as it will not display resources that are requestable from another consortial member but checked out or otherwise "unavailable" temporarily.

    Lesley Lowery supported this idea  · 
  7. 64 votes
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Lesley Lowery supported this idea  · 
  8. 65 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Lesley Lowery shared this idea  · 
  9. 160 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Lesley Lowery shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base