Elisabetta Piazza
My feedback
10 results found
-
80 votes
Can you please confirm whether the $e subfield is always expected to appear before $0 and $1 in your workflows? If this is consistently the case, it may be possible to address the issue using an XSL normalization rule to automatically position the $e subfield before these subfields.
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment
Elisabetta Piazza
commented
Yes, the $e subfield would always appear after $a (and any $c, $d, $q if present) and always BEFORE $0 and $1 in workflows.
This is urgent matter and a crucial part of cataloguers' daily work, and we would like Ex Libris to address this.
Also we would like the copy and paste issue to be addressed as well to avoid extra manual handling and potential mistakes.
https://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/accesspoints/x00.html#subfielde
https://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/1xx/100.html#subfieldeThank you!
Elisabetta Piazza
supported this idea
·
-
27 votes
Elisabetta Piazza
supported this idea
·
-
94 votes
Elisabetta Piazza
supported this idea
·
-
196 votes
AdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea will be transferred to the Primo forum as it will require product development to support this metadata.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Elisabetta Piazza
supported this idea
·
-
220 votes
Elisabetta Piazza
supported this idea
·
-
115 votes
Elisabetta Piazza
supported this idea
·
-
454 votes
Elisabetta Piazza
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
Elisabetta Piazza
supported this idea
·
-
70 votes
Elisabetta Piazza
supported this idea
·
-
91 votes
Elisabetta Piazza
supported this idea
·
Please see screenshot attached for reference