Zac
My feedback
16 results found
-
8 votes
Zac
supported this idea
·
-
116 votes
Dear All,
We are reviewing this idea and would like to ask the following: Do you refer to the "License Terms" that appear on the Discovery?
Thank you,
Zohar Shemesh
Alma Product Team
An error occurred while saving the comment
Zac
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Zac
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Zac
commented
In your example, the invoice was keyed in December and has a December fund in the invoice line. The rollover process doesn't update invoice lines, so whether or not the POL rolls over (has the fund updated) is irrelevant I think. Are you actually asking for funds in invoice lines (when the invoice is not closed) to be updated as part of the rollover process? I think that may help in your example, as expenditure in Alma would be recorded against the January/new fund.
I would like fully invoiced POLs to be rolled over for a different reason. Last year we found that 'Fully Invoiced' continuous-type orders did not rollover, but I don't see the logic in that. I think continuous orders should be updated with current year funds no matter of the invoice status.
If this change also means that fully-invoiced one-time orders would also rollover, I don't see the harm in that. The POL should just get automatically closed off once the invoice is closed, so the fund in the POL soon becomes redundant. -
3 votes
Zac
shared this idea
·
-
2 votes
Zac
supported this idea
·
Zac
shared this idea
·
-
127 votes
Zac
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
Zac
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Zac
commented
This would be great. We're about to move to using vendor codes as assigned by our finance system, which are not going to mean very much to us.
When entering vendor details in the Material Supplier field within POLs, it displays both the Vendor Name and Code. We'd like this display replicated within the invoices, or to at least have this made configurable.
-
63 votes
Zac
supported this idea
·
-
115 votes
Zac
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Zac
shared this idea
·
-
12 votes
Zac
supported this idea
·
-
31 votes
Zac
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
Zac
supported this idea
·
-
55 votes
Zac
shared this idea
·
-
58 votes
Zac
supported this idea
·
-
35 votes
Zac
shared this idea
·
I agree. We would like to be able to enter license information into Alma for ease of access, and to be able to link the license to the relevant inventory, but not have any of those terms display in Primo when the license is 'confidential'. It would be great to be able to either hide the entire license, or just the confidential terms.