Kayla
My feedback
9 results found
-
93 votes
Dear colleagues,
Thank you for raising this idea.
This idea is related to another one - https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173/suggestions/48370850, which was part of the CERV cycle in 2025, but did not make it to the final list.
During the analysis, 3 possible approaches were discussed, each has a different estimation and effort:
Option 1: New dedicated process type
- It will be possible to mark specific items as "unavailable", similarly to the way it is possible to mark them as "missing"
- Items marked as "unavailable" will be considered as "not in place"
- The new "unavailable" option will appear as a possible process type in all the places where there is a list of process types, including configuration options such as Fulfillment Unit Rules
Option 2: Mark a location as "unavailable"
- It will be possible to mark a location as "unavailable"
- All items in this location will be considered as "not in place"
- The…
Kayla
supported this idea
·
-
62 votes
Kayla
supported this idea
·
-
57 votes
Kayla
supported this idea
·
-
107 votes
Kayla
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Kayla
shared this idea
·
-
86 votes
Kayla
supported this idea
·
-
129 votes
Kayla
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment
Kayla
shared this idea
·
-
26 votes
Kayla
shared this idea
·
So you can only do restrictions by desk? That doesn't work as our reserves are at the same desk as our main collection. We need restriction from Item type.