Anonymous
My feedback
14 results found
-
150 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
162 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
421 votes
Thank you for the suggested idea.
After reading it carefully, I understand that the main pain point here is the removal/fix of items already received.
To be more specific, the description of already received items should be updated to reflect the new pattern.
- Is this understanding correct?
- How often such change happens?
- Can you please add examples of the existing description and the needed update?
- Can the 'Update items using Excel load' CloudApp be utilized for fixing the description? see https://developers.exlibrisgroup.com/appcenter/item-updater-by-excel/
Thanks for the collaboration,
Tamar Fuches
Alma product
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
64 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
88 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
48 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
25 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
213 votes
Dear colleagues,
Thanks you for suggesting this idea.
After reading it carefully, my understanding is that the need is for a new “entity” which will serve as a “bridge” between encumbrance and expenditure. This bridge will be named “Pending invoices”.
Any POL which is invoiced will be disencumbered and the amount will be added to the “pending invoices balance”. When an invoice is approved, the amount should be reduced from the “pending invoices balance” and added as an expenditure.
- Is this understanding correct?
- Do you think that the definition of using this "bridge" should be in institution level, or might be different from invoice to invoice?
Please note that this is a complicated addition. We will need to define the behavior in rollover, and in any place that changes balances etc.
Thanks for your collaboration,
Tamar Fuches
Alma product team
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
57 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
51 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
70 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·