Ruth
My feedback
32 results found
-
18 votes
Ruth
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
AdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Ruth
shared this idea
·
-
129 votes
Ruth
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
AdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Ruth
shared this idea
·
-
16 votes
Ruth
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
Ruth
supported this idea
·
-
61 votes
Ruth
supported this idea
·
-
76 votes
Ruth
supported this idea
·
-
67 votes
Ruth
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
Ruth
supported this idea
·
-
213 votes
Dear colleagues,
Thanks you for suggesting this idea.
After reading it carefully, my understanding is that the need is for a new “entity” which will serve as a “bridge” between encumbrance and expenditure. This bridge will be named “Pending invoices”.
Any POL which is invoiced will be disencumbered and the amount will be added to the “pending invoices balance”. When an invoice is approved, the amount should be reduced from the “pending invoices balance” and added as an expenditure.
- Is this understanding correct?
- Do you think that the definition of using this "bridge" should be in institution level, or might be different from invoice to invoice?
Please note that this is a complicated addition. We will need to define the behavior in rollover, and in any place that changes balances etc.
Thanks for your collaboration,
Tamar Fuches
Alma product team
Ruth
supported this idea
·
-
53 votes
Ruth
supported this idea
·