Skip to content

Karl Lehtonen

My feedback

8 results found

  1. 23 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Karl Lehtonen supported this idea  · 
  2. 30 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Karl Lehtonen commented  · 

    we have had so many issues with this, and found it to be a poorly implemented concept over all. would love the option in import profiles to retain existing suppression status.

    Karl Lehtonen supported this idea  · 
  3. 34 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Karl Lehtonen supported this idea  · 
  4. 32 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Karl Lehtonen supported this idea  · 
  5. 44 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Karl Lehtonen supported this idea  · 
  6. 44 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Karl Lehtonen supported this idea  · 
  7. 178 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Karl Lehtonen supported this idea  · 
  8. 69 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Dana Moshkovits responded

    Clarification was provided regarding the functionality requested – which is not to delete portfolios but rather detaching portfolios from the collection and setting them as standalone portfolios.
    Re-opening the idea.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Karl Lehtonen commented  · 

    i'd like to suggest an approach to this idea.

    if we could run a job on a portfolio managed set to disassociate members of that set from their collection, rendering those portfolios standalone - so that they can then be identifiable as standalone (eg via repository search "is standalone"), or can simply be filed into an alternate collection - certainly valuable with publishers merging, demerging and moving content rights around. again, probably only applicable to local portfolios where local staff take into account applicable parser parameters or simply use static URLs. thanks for suggesting - i would very much like to see this implemented. :)

    Karl Lehtonen supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base