Keren Stiles
My feedback
19 results found
-
794 votes
Thanks for the examples - we will review them and discuss our options.
Best,
Tamar
Keren Stiles
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesKeren Stiles
shared this idea
·
-
125 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Keren Stiles
commented
We have recently (January 2019) done some more usability testing on our instance of Primo and can confirm that students still can't even tell that a way to exclude facets exists, much less find out how to use it. We have only been using the new UI for 5 months, but even frequent users haven't stumbled across this functionality.
Keren Stiles
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Keren Stiles
commented
I think this is a good idea, but it's similar to another one in the system, so I've voted for https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/33060274-the-option-to-search-the-contents-of-my-collection
-
202 votes
We are considering adding a field to the course record in Alma, reportable in Analytics, for the faculty/school. It could be used for reporting purposes but not for discovery purposes. In other words, you would be able to pull list usage by faculty/school, but end users would not be able to browse by faculty/school. Would it still be helpful?
Keren Stiles
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Keren Stiles
commented
I have created a separate idea about allowing libraries to select which citation style is the default selection in the Citations dialogue: https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/36182233-allow-libraries-to-select-which-citation-style-is
An error occurred while saving the comment Keren Stiles
commented
I agree with Adam that being able to set a particular style as the default to show as selected in the Citations dialogue would be useful.
I wonder if the support for any Citation Style Language that's due with the February 2019 release will allow us to move to Cite them Right Harvard? It seems to be in teh CSL github as a style: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/blob/master/harvard-cite-them-right.csl
An error occurred while saving the comment Keren Stiles
commented
I wonder if the support for Citation Style Language which is due in the February 2019 release will allow us to set up Cite them Right Harvard style ourselves. It seems to be in the CSL github: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/blob/master/harvard-cite-them-right.csl
I agree that being able to set Harvard (or your style of choice) as the default selection in the Citations dialogue would be really helpful to our users.
-
78 votesKeren Stiles
supported this idea
·
-
32 votesKeren Stiles
supported this idea
·
-
36 votesKeren Stiles
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesKeren Stiles
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesKeren Stiles
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesKeren Stiles
supported this idea
·
-
168 votesKeren Stiles
supported this idea
·
-
45 votesKeren Stiles
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Keren Stiles
commented
I agree that being able to control what displays via the Back Office would be helpful because different libraries will have different needs.
However, to me the more important point Lars makes is that the new UI would be improved by being less reliant on mouse-overs, not only on the virtual browse display, but also for 'sticky facets' and other elements. Mouse-over interactions don't make it evident to sighted users that they are available at all, and as Lars says don't work on touch screen interfaces.
-
28 votesKeren Stiles
shared this idea
·
-
22 votesKeren Stiles
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesKeren Stiles
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesKeren Stiles
shared this idea
·
MS, that is the 'out of the box' default presentation of the filters, rather than a custom solution. It does clutter the interface less, but usability testing shows that it leads to most users never discovering that it's possible to filter by more than one filter in a facet group, or that it's possible to exclude filters. Therefore they are left with the impression that they can only filter by one resource type at a time, or one subject at a time, etc.