Skip to content

Keren Stiles

My feedback

19 results found

  1. 794 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Content » other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Keren Stiles supported this idea  · 
  2. 9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Keren Stiles shared this idea  · 
  3. 125 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Keren Stiles commented  · 

    MS, that is the 'out of the box' default presentation of the filters, rather than a custom solution. It does clutter the interface less, but usability testing shows that it leads to most users never discovering that it's possible to filter by more than one filter in a facet group, or that it's possible to exclude filters. Therefore they are left with the impression that they can only filter by one resource type at a time, or one subject at a time, etc.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Keren Stiles commented  · 

    We have recently (January 2019) done some more usability testing on our instance of Primo and can confirm that students still can't even tell that a way to exclude facets exists, much less find out how to use it. We have only been using the new UI for 5 months, but even frequent users haven't stumbled across this functionality.

    Keren Stiles supported this idea  · 
  4. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Keren Stiles commented  · 

    I think this is a good idea, but it's similar to another one in the system, so I've voted for https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/33060274-the-option-to-search-the-contents-of-my-collection

  5. 202 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We are considering adding a field to the course record in Alma, reportable in Analytics, for the faculty/school. It could be used for reporting purposes but not for discovery purposes. In other words, you would be able to pull list usage by faculty/school, but end users would not be able to browse by faculty/school. Would it still be helpful? 

    Keren Stiles supported this idea  · 
  6. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Keren Stiles commented  · 

    I have created a separate idea about allowing libraries to select which citation style is the default selection in the Citations dialogue: https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/36182233-allow-libraries-to-select-which-citation-style-is

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Keren Stiles commented  · 

    I agree with Adam that being able to set a particular style as the default to show as selected in the Citations dialogue would be useful.

    I wonder if the support for any Citation Style Language that's due with the February 2019 release will allow us to move to Cite them Right Harvard? It seems to be in teh CSL github as a style: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/blob/master/harvard-cite-them-right.csl

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Keren Stiles commented  · 

    I wonder if the support for Citation Style Language which is due in the February 2019 release will allow us to set up Cite them Right Harvard style ourselves. It seems to be in the CSL github: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/blob/master/harvard-cite-them-right.csl

    I agree that being able to set Harvard (or your style of choice) as the default selection in the Citations dialogue would be really helpful to our users.

  7. 59 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Accepted  ·  10 comments  ·  Alma » Link Resolver  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Keren Stiles commented  · 

    Thanks, Meredith. I have voted for it.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Keren Stiles commented  · 

    Meredith, we probably do need a separate idea for journal coverage dates to show in the brief results page. The option to disable direct linking for journals now exists, but there still isn't a way to make the coverage dates appear in the brief results and our users would really appreciate it if we could do that.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Keren Stiles commented  · 

    Hi Dana, I couldn't spot this on the roadmap. Can you give us any idea of the timing for the release of this functionality?
    Thanks, Keren

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Keren Stiles commented  · 

    Thanks for the update, Dana. We're delighted to hear this is planned.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Keren Stiles commented  · 

    On further reflection the Direct Linking aspect is possibly distracting from the real user requirement, which is to have journal coverage dates shown for all journal title search results, preferably in the 'Brief results' tile.

    Keren Stiles shared this idea  · 
  8. 78 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Keren Stiles supported this idea  · 
  9. 32 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Keren Stiles supported this idea  · 
  10. 39 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Keren Stiles supported this idea  · 
  11. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Keren Stiles supported this idea  · 
  12. 107 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hello,

    Unfortunately there are some delays with producing the file.

    It is no longer planned, and I apologize for misleading the community with giving a timeline.

    I will update the idea once i have more information.

    Thanks,

    Tamar

    Keren Stiles supported this idea  · 
  13. 23 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Keren Stiles supported this idea  · 
  14. 168 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Keren Stiles supported this idea  · 
  15. 159 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Keren Stiles supported this idea  · 
  16. 45 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Keren Stiles supported this idea  · 
  17. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Keren Stiles commented  · 

    I agree that being able to control what displays via the Back Office would be helpful because different libraries will have different needs.

    However, to me the more important point Lars makes is that the new UI would be improved by being less reliant on mouse-overs, not only on the virtual browse display, but also for 'sticky facets' and other elements. Mouse-over interactions don't make it evident to sighted users that they are available at all, and as Lars says don't work on touch screen interfaces.

  18. 28 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Keren Stiles shared this idea  · 
  19. 22 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Link Resolver  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Keren Stiles supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base