220 results found

1. Fix Cite It! login redirect

   When a user hits the Cite It! bookmarklet, if they are already logged into SSO, it works perfectly. However, if they aren't logged in, then hitting the Cite It! button lets them log in and takes them to Leganto. What it should do is capture the URL where they were when they first hit the bookmarklet, then login, then redirect back to the original page and open up the form to save the citation to a list or to the collection. This would make the use of the Cite It! button completely seamless for users.

   67 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   3 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Completed  ·  AdminMiriam (Leganto BA, Ex Libris) responded

   Available in June release.

2. Add semester and year as possible fields in the Find list advanced search

   Find list settings allow librarians to customize the basic and advanced search interfaces in Leganto. However year and semester are not among the search fields to be chosen from. These are useful search criteria and we would like them to be added to the Find list setting table.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Completed  ·  AdminMiriam (Leganto BA, Ex Libris) responded

   Available in Feb release

3. Multiple rollover

   The rollover functionality is great and is used to reduce the workload for the staff.

   We have encountered one issue. What we have seen is that the work on the establishing of the courses themselves in the course management system (external system) often takes a long time and there are changes throughout the year. That means that at the point where the library would like to perform the rollover there will only be a portion of the courses that are ready in the course system. This means that there are a need to perform a 2nd rollover at a later time (or even a 3rd or 4th load). If they wait with the rollover until all of the courses are ready the do not have enough time to perform the quality control of the lists before the term starts.

   In the extract from the course management system we can not select only courses that has not been part of a previous load (normal or rollover). That means that all of the courses are added to the import-file. This is not a problem, and sometimes an advantage, for the "normal" load as the exisiting courses are updated and the new ones added. With rollover there is a problem; if the course has been rolled over earlier the list will be rolled over again and create a duplicate list.

   What we would like to do is to be able to do multiple rollovers for a complete list of courses without duplicating the same list each time. Example: If you do a rollover and then immidiately after runs the same file again (with rollover) the result of the second run would be the same as if the operation was "Normal".

   Setting a flag on the course/list that it has been rolled over and then set a tickbox in the integration profile that says do not rollover if the course has previous been rolled over should not be difficult and would solve the problem.

   The rollover functionality is great and is used to reduce the workload for the staff.

   We have encountered one issue. What we have seen is that the work on the establishing of the courses themselves in the course management system (external system) often takes a long time and there are changes throughout the year. That means that at the point where the library would like to perform the rollover there will only be a portion of the courses that are ready in the course system. This means that there are a need to perform a 2nd rollover at a later… more

   216 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   Completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. Allow multiple citation material types to be selected in questions and answers mapping table

   When configuring the question and answer pop up feature, currently in the question mapping table only one citation material type can be selected per row.

   Therefore, if you want the same question and answers pop up to appear for more than one citation, you need to duplicate the question on multiple rows for each citation type. Allowing multiple citation types to be selected per row would avoid this duplication.

   For example, we have a pop up configured to appear for books, book chapter and DVD citations to ask instructors to tag them for importance (Core, Essential etc), which allows library staff to implement the purchasing policy. There are 9 possible options instructors can choose from. So in the question table, we have to create 3 separate questions for each material type and in the answer table, map the 9 individual answers 3 times. Allowing multiple citation types to be selected for one question would mean everything would only have to be inputted once, reducing the number of rows in the answer table particularly from 27 to 9.

   When configuring the question and answer pop up feature, currently in the question mapping table only one citation material type can be selected per row.

   Therefore, if you want the same question and answers pop up to appear for more than one citation, you need to duplicate the question on multiple rows for each citation type. Allowing multiple citation types to be selected per row would avoid this duplication.

   For example, we have a pop up configured to appear for books, book chapter and DVD citations to ask instructors to tag them for importance (Core, Essential etc), which allows library… more

   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Completed  ·  AdminMiriam (Leganto BA, Ex Libris) responded

   Available in July release

5. Locked lists should be enabled for rollover and duplication in Leganto

   At present when a reading list is locked it cannot be duplicated or rolled over by a user in Leganto.

   We lock lists to preserve them in accordance with University policy on retention of learning materials at the end of each semester.
   Instructors may want to go back to older lists to create new ones. To do so they have to contact the Library if they want to duplicate or rollover a list from a previous semester.

   Locking a list should only prevent that list from being changed. It should not prevent someone from using it to create a new list either by rollover or duplication.

   At present when a reading list is locked it cannot be duplicated or rolled over by a user in Leganto.

   We lock lists to preserve them in accordance with University policy on retention of learning materials at the end of each semester.
   Instructors may want to go back to older lists to create new ones. To do so they have to contact the Library if they want to duplicate or rollover a list from a previous semester.

   Locking a list should only prevent that list from being changed. It should not prevent someone from using it to create a new… more

   15 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Completed  ·  AdminMiriam (Leganto BA, Ex Libris) responded

   Available in July release

6. Add "list ID" to searchable ids/All in Alma reading lists persistent search

   It would be useful if reading list ID was searchable for "Reading lists" in the persistent search bar in Alma. Currently it is List code, but this is not important to many users, especially with leganto, and given that the list id is really the only pure list id you see in Leganto front end (address bar, permalink) it would assist with error checking, isolating oddities from analytics reporting, and being sure people have easy and consistent access to the right versions of materials between the front end and the back end. Going from Alma to Leganto the link uses the list id, but if someone gave you a list id to get to the list in Alma it is not so straightforward, seemingly.

   It would be useful if reading list ID was searchable for "Reading lists" in the persistent search bar in Alma. Currently it is List code, but this is not important to many users, especially with leganto, and given that the list id is really the only pure list id you see in Leganto front end (address bar, permalink) it would assist with error checking, isolating oddities from analytics reporting, and being sure people have easy and consistent access to the right versions of materials between the front end and the back end. Going from Alma to Leganto the link uses… more

   0 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   Completed  ·  2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Allow reports on reading lists without citations in Leganto analytics

   We often produce reading lists (RL) for courses that only have syllabus selected by the student. These lists don't include any citations, but often have information essential to the students. Our problem is that we can't find a way to retrieve these RLs in analytics, together with RLs that include citations.

   Gal Darom said in May 2019 (in the ListServ...), when I asked for help to find all RLs associated to courses:
   The relation (data schema) between Courses -> Lists is done through the citations measure, and looks like that “Course -> Citations ->Lists”
   The outcome of this relation explain your founding's:
   A report that present Courses associated to RL – will not present RL that does not have citations because those RL are not part of the data.
   He concluded: A report presenting empty lists associated to a course is not available looking at the data model.

   Even if we just try to find all RLs (associated or not to courses), we can't retrieve the RLs without any citations.
   We like to have the data schema not including citations as a mandatory measure, or at least allow NULL-values. It should be enough to use the ReadingListCode or ReadingListId to get a full report on both reading lists with citations and without.

   We often produce reading lists (RL) for courses that only have syllabus selected by the student. These lists don't include any citations, but often have information essential to the students. Our problem is that we can't find a way to retrieve these RLs in analytics, together with RLs that include citations.

   Gal Darom said in May 2019 (in the ListServ...), when I asked for help to find all RLs associated to courses:
   The relation (data schema) between Courses -> Lists is done through the citations measure, and looks like that “Course -> Citations ->Lists”
   The outcome of this relation explain… more

   98 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Completed  ·  AdminMiriam (Leganto BA, Ex Libris) responded

   Available in September release.

8. Let the library choose to have "More item details" in Edit item, open as default

   We would like to be able to choose to have the "More item details" (when editing a reference) open as default, instead of as a drop down choice like now.

   This would make it easier for teachers to see which fields are possible to edit. This will not affect the Save-button, as it is fixed to the bottom.

   •  

   63 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Completed  ·  AdminMiriam (Leganto BA, Ex Libris) responded

   Available in August release

9. Hide Visibility (restrictions) section from display for citations

   We would like to be able to hide the Visibility (restrictions) section from displaying for instructors for citations.

   •  

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Completed  ·  AdminJessie Ransom (Leganto Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

   The visibility dates were removed in the new UI

10. Associate new reading list from inside course with that course

    When a reading list is created from inside a course, it would help the instructor if the list would then automatically be associated with that course. Or at least be very easy to associate it with the course that the instructor is currently in.

    At this moment, the instructor is inside a course in Leganto. Adds a new reading list. Has to associate that reading list to a course all over again, while the instructor is already there.
    This is confusing for instructors.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Completed  ·  AdminMiriam (Leganto BA, Ex Libris) responded

    This is resolved in the 2023 Leganto new user experience. When instructors begin in the LMS and create a new or additional list in Leganto, the list will be automatically associated with the course.

11. Library Physical Digitization Request Option to Attach File to Citation For Which It Was Requested

    When using the Library Physical Digitization Request option to create a digitization process for a file for a Reading List, the file is delivered to the Requestor at the end of the workflow. This request is asking for another option: an option for Alma to automatically upload the file to the citation for which it was requested. This would save a lot of time spent used for file retrieval and file management and would prevent the file being uploaded on the wrong citation.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. Citation Processing rules to use same Leganto real time availability merge rules for purchase requests

    Hi,
    Ideal Scenario:
    We currently have a citation processing rule set to automatically trigger a purchase request, if a book has a particular tag, and there are no E versions of the P available in repository. If there is an E copy available then the purchase request should not be triggered. If no E version is available, but the citation meets all other parameters in that particular citation processing rule, then a purchase request should automatically be triggered

    Issue:
    The problem at the moment is that, Leganto is not relating our E version to our P, and so is still triggering a purchase requests even though an E version is available. This is due to our institution cataloguing E and P as 2 separate Marc records, and many of these do not have a linking ISBN in the 020 field. This would be similar to a lot of other institutions who don't merge the marc records together, as keeping them separate is considered to many as cataloguing best practice.

    Solution:
    To display real time availability for citations, Leganto does however use merge rules for records in Alma (and their related records) and records in Primo, including dedup'd records (see attached image). This therefore displays P and E versions of the same title together. Can we request for this same 'Merging repository availability' rule to be used as the basis for citation processing rules. It proves to be more successful in linking P and E versions of the same title together.

    Hi,
    Ideal Scenario:
    We currently have a citation processing rule set to automatically trigger a purchase request, if a book has a particular tag, and there are no E versions of the P available in repository. If there is an E copy available then the purchase request should not be triggered. If no E version is available, but the citation meets all other parameters in that particular citation processing rule, then a purchase request should automatically be triggered

    Issue:
    The problem at the moment is that, Leganto is not relating our E version to our P, and so is still… more

    •  

    139 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Completed  ·  2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. Allow public notes to be copied when copying citations

    Currently it is not possible to copy Public Notes when copying a citation using either the citation copy option from the item menu, OR when using the Bag it feature and copy option there.
    It is possible, however, to copy Public Notes when rolling lists over in the Course Loader/Instructor Rollover.
    It would be useful if it was possible to copy Public Notes for citations when copying citation in general - this could perhaps be a prompted option or a configurable one depending on whether the single or bulk selection of citation contains Public Notes.
    No doubt the same could be said about tags, but the idea here is to allow list editors to save effort when copying items.

    Currently it is not possible to copy Public Notes when copying a citation using either the citation copy option from the item menu, OR when using the Bag it feature and copy option there.
    It is possible, however, to copy Public Notes when rolling lists over in the Course Loader/Instructor Rollover.
    It would be useful if it was possible to copy Public Notes for citations when copying citation in general - this could perhaps be a prompted option or a configurable one depending on whether the single or bulk selection of citation contains Public Notes.
    No doubt the same could… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Completed  ·  AdminMiriam (Leganto BA, Ex Libris) responded

    Available in August release.

14. Improve access to Public Notes - allow editing from the Citation edit option

    Public Notes (instructor notes on resources visible to list users) are treated oddly in Leganto compared to other reading list systems - that is they are not given equal status as other citation metadata fields in the Citation Edit form.

    Public Notes are regularly used by Instructors to annotate or qualify resources; to comment on and direct students as to the quality, purpose, priority, and considerations of using certain resources, or parts of resources.

    In that sense the Public Note should be accessible for editing when editing all other item metadata (such as chapter title etc.

    Currently the Public note field appears only in the Create citation dialogue, but not in the Edit citation form which is confusing to all list editors, whether academics or Library staff.

    Having to click into the full view of an item to add a pubic note lessens the utility of having an instructor public note when editing items. Frequently users will add items and then want to add a comment, or a tag etc, having to click into separate boxes in different parts of the process is inefficient.

    Public Notes (instructor notes on resources visible to list users) are treated oddly in Leganto compared to other reading list systems - that is they are not given equal status as other citation metadata fields in the Citation Edit form.

    Public Notes are regularly used by Instructors to annotate or qualify resources; to comment on and direct students as to the quality, purpose, priority, and considerations of using certain resources, or parts of resources.

    In that sense the Public Note should be accessible for editing when editing all other item metadata (such as chapter title etc.

    Currently the Public note… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. Citation menu options should be available from citation view

    It would be helpful if there was more access to the citation menu options when viewing the citation in Leganto. Users should be able to Copy to my collection, Send to Library, Mark as Read, get LTI Direct Access, get a permalink and Set Complete.

    Where this is a real problem however is for instructors who are using the Unlink LTI option on a citation from the LMS. To unlink, they follow the link to the citation, then have to know to go to the section to find the citation and its menu.

    Ideally both unlink and relink should be visible from the citation view.

    It would be helpful if there was more access to the citation menu options when viewing the citation in Leganto. Users should be able to Copy to my collection, Send to Library, Mark as Read, get LTI Direct Access, get a permalink and Set Complete.

    Where this is a real problem however is for instructors who are using the Unlink LTI option on a citation from the LMS. To unlink, they follow the link to the citation, then have to know to go to the section to find the citation and its menu.

    Ideally both unlink and relink should be… more

    •  

    128 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Completed  ·  AdminMiriam (Leganto BA, Ex Libris) responded

    Available in Feb release

16. API for course enrollment

    In September (2019) there was added a job in Alma that makes it possible to enabe a link between a student and a course so that the user is associated with the course. More information: https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Leganto/Product_Documentation/Leganto_Online_Help_(English)/Leganto_Administration_Guide/Configuring_Leganto_Integration_Profiles/Configuring_Importing_Course_Enrollment_Jobs

    We see that this may be an useful feature, but we think that it would be more useful to be able to create this link using API instead of a filebased internal job in Alma.

    This would make it easier to make the updates in real-time and use a message queue-based architecture.

    Could such API be added to the API-suite for Leganto/Alma?

    6 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Completed  ·  AdminMiriam (Leganto BA, Ex Libris) responded

    Available in September release.

17. Option to rescale the right (discussion) pane

    at this moment you're able to expand the 'discussion panel' at the right in Leganto. However our instructors would like to be able to make this pane even smaller when working on their lists!

    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Completed  ·  AdminMiriam (Leganto BA, Ex Libris) responded

    Available in Mar 2020

18. Have statuses in the task list match reading list statuses

    In Alma, librarians can be presented with different "tasks" in the task list, including for example
    "Unassigned - Ready for processing" and "Unassigned - Processing".

    I'm not sure why Being Prepared and Ready for Processing are gathered under the label Processing in the task list, as only Ready for Processing means the library has to act upon it. This also means that "Processing" might overlap with the just "Ready for processing" task.

    It would be more convenient and logical to use the actual statuses, and only them in the task list. It would also avoid duplicates as for example "Unassigned All lists 100" and "Unassigned Processing 93" give less information that "Unassigned Being prepared 93" and "Unassigned Complete 7".

    In Alma, librarians can be presented with different "tasks" in the task list, including for example
    "Unassigned - Ready for processing" and "Unassigned - Processing".

    I'm not sure why Being Prepared and Ready for Processing are gathered under the label Processing in the task list, as only Ready for Processing means the library has to act upon it. This also means that "Processing" might overlap with the just "Ready for processing" task.

    It would be more convenient and logical to use the actual statuses, and only them in the task list. It would also avoid duplicates as for example "Unassigned… more

    6 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Completed  ·  3 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. Make Hiding Incomplete Citations feature more flexible

    There was a new feature in Leganto December 2019 release to hide incomplete citations. This feature has potential but can it be made more flexible so the Library can select which citation statuses to be shown to students and vice versa?

    User Story:
    As a librarian, our preference is for students to view all the citations besides issues that we need to verify with course instructor, e.g. copyright or licensing issues. It will be better if the Library can determine what citation statuses should be hidden from students.

    Scenario 1 :
    UNSW uses citation status of 'ILL Requested' or 'In Process' when sourcing a digitisation. In this circumstances, we still want students to be able to view the citation.

    Scenario 2 :
    UNSW uses citation status of ''Unable to source' or 'Sourcing Item availability' when course instructor gives a very vague or incorrect citation information. In this case, we don't want students to see the citation.

    There was a new feature in Leganto December 2019 release to hide incomplete citations. This feature has potential but can it be made more flexible so the Library can select which citation statuses to be shown to students and vice versa?

    User Story:
    As a librarian, our preference is for students to view all the citations besides issues that we need to verify with course instructor, e.g. copyright or licensing issues. It will be better if the Library can determine what citation statuses should be hidden from students.

    Scenario 1 :
    UNSW uses citation status of 'ILL Requested' or 'In… more

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. Improve courses usability in Alma

    I'm currently updating lots of instructors in course records. It would really help if there was a way to limit either by filter or facets for the course year in addition to Status, Term and Academic department.

    Ideally adding Courses to the persistent search bar and providing facets would be marvellous, but in the interim adding Year to the filters would help. Also, being able to sort by year, academic department would be nice.

    13 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Completed  ·  AdminMiriam (Leganto BA, Ex Libris) responded

    Available in September release.