Skip to content

Alma

Your feedback matters to us. Help us improve Alma by telling us what you’d like to see using the message areas below. You can also can support something already posted.

We would love to be able to respond to every idea that is submitted, but this is not feasible. We are, however, committed to responding to the most popular ideas—those that have received the most points.

For more information please review our FAQ and guidelines. Thank you.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

23 results found

  1. Revert the changes made to Job: Update PO Lines Information Advanced

    This really pertains to Admin >> Run a Job, but please revert the change you made to the Job: Update PO Lines Information Advanced. Currently, the job will NOT run if there are invoices on the PO. Before this change was made it did not matter.
    It does not matter to the library because the terms of a continuous order can and do change (it was a subscription, now it is offered as a continuation order), how a library chooses to catalog an item can and does change (a title was a serial, then it became a monographic series) So…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  2. Filter OUT cancelled PO Lines

    Provide a facet to filter OUT cancelled PO Lines in the PO Line view. We have a lot of cancelled PO Lines with the same title as existing PO Lines, and it is confusing and time consuming to find the 'active' PO Lines. It would help us tremendously if we could filter OUT cancelled PO Lines, perhaps even by default.

    13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  3. “Run a job” and “Create itemized set” should be available from the list of Purchase order lines

    When you are in a list of items on a bibliographic post in Alma you have the option to checkmark several items and choose “Manage selected” – “Run a job” or “Add to itemized set”/”Create itemized set”. Now that we have the list “All PO Lines” and can checkmark POLs in the list, it would be practical for these options to also be available for PO lines. Currently you only have the option of creating a logical set (if you add filters to the list) from the list “All PO Lines”. This would make it easier and quicker to run…

    8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  4. Order of action buttons in the POL

    In the new PO line interface, the action buttons available when creating a POL is not in a practical order, which causes a lot of our staff to press “save” instead of “save and continue”. This causes the POL to remain in status “in review”. The user also must use more energy to locate the correct action button. We have two different suggestions for solving this:

    1. Move the actions “Save and continue” and “order now” to the right part of the menu line and have this be marked in a stronger color than the other buttons. In the current design…

    19 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  5. PO line edit screen - Display "Recent Selections" for the "Access Provider field"

    This idea was submitted by Ex Libris to evaluate the need for the enhancement specified below:

    Today when adding/editing the "Material Supplier" field (Vendor information section), Alma present the user with the recent 5 selections in order to assist them with the selection and make their work easier with less clicks.

    The need here is to add the same functionality described above also to the "Access Provider" field.

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  6. PO Line: <series_statement> and <series_uniform_title> - missing 490/830 subfield v in the XML

    Marc21 field 490, "series-statement", and Marc21 field 830, "series-uniform-title", are available on the Order List Letter (letter code: OrderListLetter).

    However, the content is not complete :-(
    Only 490|a goes to <series_statement>, 490|v - the Volume is missing.
    Also 830 only provides |w as <series_uniform_title>, |v is missing.

    Please see example:
    035 __ |a AC04654069
    245 00 |a Keiner wird gewinnen |b populäre Musik im Wettbewerb |c Dietrich Helms ... (Hg.)
    490 1_ |a Beiträge zur Popularmusikforschung |v 33
    830 _0 |w (AT-OBV)AC00913498 |v 33 |9 O:1

    <series_statement>Beiträge zur Popularmusikforschung</series_statement>
    <series_uniform_title>(AT-OBV)AC00913498</series_uniform_title>

    Please add 490 subfield v to the XML field <series_statement>,…

    158 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Hi all,

    thank you for sharing and supporting this idea!

    As of November 2025, the acquisitions letters now include the subfields $v of MARC fields 490/830.

    Read more in the Alma Release Notes: https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Release_Notes/2025/Alma_2025_Release_Notes?mon=202511BASE#:~:text=New%20MARC%20Subfields%20in%20the%20Acquisitions%20Letters

    Best, Alma Product.

  7. PO line description should represent current bibliographical data

    Alma provides insufficient data in PO lines for the task of pulling a list of subscriptions a library has of a specific publisher's titles:

    1. The PO line description contains only bibliographical data from the bib record as it was at the time the PO line was created. Subsequent changes in the publisher data are not updated in the related PO lines.

    2. Even in newly created PO lines, Alma introduces the content of MARC field 264 _1 instead of 264 31 if such a field exists, i.e. it copies the first, not the current publisher’s name into the PO line description.

    155 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  8. Make MMS ID into a clickable link in brief PO line display

    It would be great if the MMS ID in the brief PO line display is clickable so that we can click on it and navigate directly from the PO line to the bibliographic (bib) record.

    Currently, the MMS ID is viewable in the brief PO line display but is not clickable. In contrast, the number in the Orders field within the brief bib and inventory display is clickable and we can thereby navigate directly from the brief display to the PO line(s).

    In the attached document, please find an example.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  9. Add ability to save checkbox "Update Net Price according to item quantity" to PO line templates

    The February 2022 Alma release brought an improvement in correspondence between the number of items ordered and quantity for pricing (https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Release_Notes/2022/Alma_2022_Release_Notes > Enhancements to the PO Line Pricing Section).

    We are happy, that the enabled checkbox updates the quantity for pricing amount automatically and that the checkbox is enabled by default and can be disabled in the configuration menu.

    However, we would very much appreciate the ability to save the checkbox-setting in the PO line templates. This way, if the checkbox is enabled for the whole IZ, it can still be used disabled by individual libraries by saving it…

    44 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  10. Exclude cancelled or closed POLs from the search results

    When you are searching for POLs, you are able to select one facet pertaining to the POL status to narrow down your results. What would be more helpful is if we could EXCLUDE search results based on a selected facet. For example, selecting a facet to remove all "Cancelled" POLs.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  11. PO line type - able to change from Electronic one time to Physical one time.

    So we are a separate special collections library within a larger university. Our records are separate from the university libraries. We have no electronic records. In the migration over a thousand of our order records got caught up in P2E and got changed from Physical one time to Electronic one time. I was informed that in order to fix this back, I would have to cancel re-imput the records which would result in invoices being sent out again.You can create a set and run a job to change physical one time records to electronic one time records but not the…

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  12. Add 'Renewal Note' to Analytics

    We use the 'renewal note' field on the POLs of our journal renewals. We then use Analytics to create lists of titles to be worked on and annotated as we make decisions on renewals. However, it's not possible to add the 'renewal note' to a report from Analytics, and hence we can't get all the relevant information easily into a single report. Please can this field be made available?

    18 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Completed  ·  Dana Moshkovits responded

    Completed as part of the Alma February release:

    The Renewal Note field was added to the PO Line dimension for every subject area in which it appears. It displays the note of the PO line renewal for continuous orders.

  13. Export Note to vendor into Excel

    We noticed, that when exporting a number of POLs to Excel (for example from the claims list, but also from regular search results list), the "Note to vendor" is not exported.

    This field would be very helpful for manual claiming.
    Is there any way, you could add this field to the export-function?

    156 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Completed  ·  Dana Moshkovits responded

    An option to present the "Note to vendor" is added to the file exported to Excel when exporting a list of PO lines (Export all fields).

    For more information please see Alma May Release Notes

  14. Add the ability to add notes to POLs en masse

    During some projects, it is necessary to append the same note to a group of POLs (cancellation projects, for instance).

    Being able to add a note to a group of POLs en masse (versus adding the note to each POL one by one) would be helpful.

    120 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  15. Order lines - Simple / Advanced search: missing "PO line owner"

    Our colleagues are desperately missing the field "PO line owner" when searching for PO lines.

    In Simple search the field "PO line owner" is provided at least as an filter option in the results list.
    But the results list of the Advanced search does not provide filter options. :-(

    74 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Completed  ·  Dana Moshkovits responded

    An additional search field “Owning Library” was added to Alma advanced search when searching by PO Line.
    For more information please see Alma December Release notes

  16. Add more fields to the Update PO lines information & Update POLs Advanced jobs

    All fields of the POL should be something that can be updated by job.
    Some specific fields that it would be really helpful to have in the Update PO Lines Information or Update PO Lines Information Advanced jobs are:
    Subscription from/to dates
    Renewal date
    Cancellation Restriction checkbox & Cancellation Restriction Note
    While it might be possible to update these fields via the APIs, the permissions and skill level needed to use the APIs is much higher than to run jobs.

    180 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  17. Batch deleting PO's

    There is currently no system job to delete PO's. These have to be done manually using the Acquisitions>Purchase Order>Delete PO function individually in ALMA.

    We have 1000's of old orders migrated from our legacy system that are no longer required. We also now only keep 7 years worth of orders in line with current financial practice and so would like to be able to set a job to batch delete at rollover into the new fiscal period.

    306 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  18. Automatic Hold Item check for its interested user

    Please make it possible that when a PO line has an interested user, its Hold Item gets checked automatically by using any of the following methods:

    1) the library's configuration change
    2) Import Profile setting
    3) Update PO line job

    This function is necessary for Patron-Driven Acquisitions which takes up most of our purchases. Now we manually open each PO line and tick the box one by one, which is one of the biggest hassles when there are hundreds of PO lines to review.

    144 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  19. Copy POL data to new POL with different order line type

    We still experience issues when a POL is created with the 'wrong' POL type / inventory type (e.g., a print POL is created but e-inventory needs to be attached) - these 'incorrect' POLs must be deleted and recreated manually. There are other ideas out there to make POL types and architecture more flexible, such as this one:

    https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/10634154-allow-linking-po-lines-to-electronic-inventory-reg

    and Ex Libris has done some work on this, e.g.:

    https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/13876698-ability-to-change-purchase-type-order-line-type

    In the comments of that request, Ex Libris indicates that allowing the kind of flexibility to 'change' a POL order line type - or attach different types of inventory to it…

    20 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  20. Allow the system to change formats for example Physical One time to Electronic One-time and vice versa.

    At the moment when you have created an order for a physical book, but then want to accept the e-book instead, the system does not allow you to change the format as it expects you to follow the workflow of the format you ordered in the first place.

    118 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
← Previous 1
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base