Daniela Homberger
My feedback
7 results found
-
129 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Daniela Homberger
supported this idea
·
-
107 votes
As you all know, the Community Zone content is shared among all Alma customers, each with different requirements. Therefore, I’m not sure this request would be acceptable to the wider Alma community. That said, if there were a consensus on a closed list of fields that CZ bibliographic records should be restricted from deleting per MARC profile, this capability already exists and is managed by the Ex Libris Content Operations team. Unfortunately, this is not available for authorities. Do you think such a consensus could be reached?
Daniela Homberger
supported this idea
·
-
195 votes
Hello all,
We are currently reviewing it to assess its technical feasibility and implications. We’ll follow up once we have more clarity.
Daniela Homberger
supported this idea
·
-
71 votes
Daniela Homberger
supported this idea
·
-
425 votes
Thank you for the suggested idea.
After reading it carefully, I understand that the main pain point here is the removal/fix of items already received.
To be more specific, the description of already received items should be updated to reflect the new pattern.
- Is this understanding correct?
- How often such change happens?
- Can you please add examples of the existing description and the needed update?
- Can the 'Update items using Excel load' CloudApp be utilized for fixing the description? see https://developers.exlibrisgroup.com/appcenter/item-updater-by-excel/
Thanks for the collaboration,
Tamar Fuches
Alma product
Daniela Homberger
supported this idea
·
-
161 votes
Daniela Homberger
supported this idea
·
-
585 votes
Daniela Homberger
supported this idea
·
it would help to have a customisable list of all characters/special characters/diacritics of the Unicode table(s)