Skip to content

Paulina Harper

My feedback

11 results found

  1. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Paulina Harper shared this idea  · 
  2. 91 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Multi-select facets are supported in Alma’s new UX searches, including Holdings, Borrowing requests, Lending requests and PO Lines, and will become supported in other searches as they are gradually moved to our new UX. Excluding facets will also be gradually added to new UX searches.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Paulina Harper commented  · 

    I would love to be able to exclude Closed PO Lines when I am looking at a big list but keep all the other statuses available to view.

    Paulina Harper supported this idea  · 
  3. 337 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Paulina Harper commented  · 

    I'm surprised to find this functionality doesn't already exist!

    Paulina Harper supported this idea  · 
  4. 21 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Paulina Harper commented  · 

    We would like to be able to add the electronic collection as a facet on Primo search results page -- so users can exclude items in a particular collection they don't have access to from their results. There is currently no way to do this precisely.

    The workaround proposed by Ex Libris is to use a norm rule to add the name of the electronic collection (Collection A) into the bibliographic record, and then create a facet that can filter on this field. However, if a user then excludes Collection A from their search results, they will be excluding at the bibliographic level, and will exclude ebooks that are available in both Collection A and Collection B (to which they do have access).

    Paulina Harper supported this idea  · 
  5. 18 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Paulina Harper shared this idea  · 
  6. 140 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Paulina Harper shared this idea  · 
  7. 96 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous responded

    Submitted by Ex Libris PM on behalf of our customers

    Paulina Harper supported this idea  · 
  8. 13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Paulina Harper commented  · 

    It would also be lovely to be able to update the Subscription dates range in batch for every invoice line on an invoice, rather than having to touch each one manually.

    Paulina Harper supported this idea  · 
  9. 36 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Paulina Harper commented  · 

    Our IT dept would prefer we use a unique, but very long, string of letters and numbers as our unique identifiers in Alma/Primo, but if we do we will have the same problem as Chris. We would also like the "updated by" field to be configurable to use Last Name, First Name or something else human-identifiable.

    Paulina Harper supported this idea  · 
  10. 24 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Paulina Harper supported this idea  · 
  11. 350 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Paulina Harper supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base