R Candrian
My feedback
24 results found
-
22 votesR Candrian supported this idea ·
-
75 votesR Candrian supported this idea ·
-
8 votesR Candrian supported this idea ·
-
40 votesR Candrian supported this idea ·
-
51 votesR Candrian supported this idea ·
-
72 votesR Candrian supported this idea ·
-
243 votesR Candrian supported this idea ·
-
181 votesR Candrian supported this idea ·
-
155 votesR Candrian supported this idea ·
-
104 votesR Candrian supported this idea ·
-
54 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment R Candrian supported this idea · -
138 votesR Candrian supported this idea ·
-
142 votesR Candrian supported this idea ·
-
515 votesR Candrian supported this idea ·
-
229 votesR Candrian supported this idea ·
-
163 votesR Candrian supported this idea ·
-
32 votesR Candrian supported this idea ·
-
18 votesR Candrian supported this idea ·
-
314 votesR Candrian supported this idea ·
-
230 votes
Dear community,
Thanks for this idea.
I would like to make sure that we fully understand the use case:
1 The need is to allow users to change the currency for PO lines which were packaged and sent.
Can you please specify the statuses in which this is needed?
2 Upon such change, funding should be handled: disencumbrance for the original encumbered amount, and a new encumbrance on the fund with the new amount and currency. Is this correct?
3 The POL should be removed from the original PO, and re-packed. Is this correct?
4 Should the order be sent to the vendor again?
Thanks,
Tamar Fuches
Alma product
R Candrian supported this idea ·
Dear Simon, thank you for bringing up this issue (loooong ago). This is really something I keep on stumbling over when working at the desk. All the items that are returned at our library are scanned in using "return items". But when there is a reservation for an item, the slip that is printed for putting the item on hold is not the same as when I use the functionality "scan in items". With "return items" the letter "FulResourceRequestSlipLetter" is produced, whereas with "scan in items" the letter "FulHoldShelfRequestSlipLetter" is produced. As we have a hold shelf that our customers can access by themselves, we want the letters to be anonymized and looking the same for all reservations. We therefore anonymized the "FulHoldShelfRequestSlipLetter". But we don't want to repeat that with the "FulResourceRequestSlipLetter" as this letter is used in other situations, too (e.g. printing the slip for items on the list "pick from shelf").
I don't understand why there are two different letters. So, as Simon already wrote, sometimes "return items" is better and in other cases "scan in items" is better, but we do not know before scanning an item which option is better in this case. This is annoying.