Sean Purcell

My feedback

  1. 276 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Sean Purcell supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Sean Purcell commented  · 

    Yes! We agree! I was about to post a similar idea, but figured it would be better to ride on the coattails of this one. Please upvote! Here's another way of explaining this:

    Collection Discovery: Make collection path links configureable to only show for the library that created that collection

    We are a consortia of 26 Alma/Primo institutions in Georgia. One of our institutions has set up a number of local Alma collections and the collection path links for these resources show up just fine in this institution's Primo. Unfortunately they are also showing up in other institutions' Primo instances when the bib is shared by those institutions. For example, let's say that institution A sets up a local Alma collection. If institution B owns a title that is contained in Institution A's collection, when a patron at institution B searches for that book in their instance of Primo they will see institution A's collection path links in the details area. We've been told by Ex Libris support and Ex Libris development that Collection Discovery is not intended to be restricted to a single institution, thus the links show for the entire consortium. We believe this "feature" makes Collection Discovery unusable for consortia. Please vote on this to convince Ex Libris to make it so that collection path links can be configured to show only for the institution that created that collection.

  2. 20 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Sean Purcell shared this idea  · 
  3. 24 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Link Resolver  ·  Admin →
    Sean Purcell shared this idea  · 
  4. 57 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Sean Purcell supported this idea  · 
  5. 17 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    Sean Purcell shared this idea  · 
  6. 15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Sean Purcell supported this idea  · 
  7. 31 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Sean Purcell supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Sean Purcell commented  · 

    We use cataloging level as well, and it would be great to be able to set the cataloging level of imported records to whatever we'd like, via the import profile. For example, for some records, we'd like a lower cataloging level, like if the records coming in are very brief. For more complete records, we'd like to be able to set it to a higher level.

  8. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Sean Purcell shared this idea  · 
  9. 16 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Sean Purcell shared this idea  · 
  10. 24 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Sean Purcell supported this idea  · 
  11. 93 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Sean Purcell supported this idea  · 
    Sean Purcell shared this idea  · 
  12. 530 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Sean Purcell commented  · 

    When doing an "electronic titles" search there is no "IS NOT" operator for "electronic collection name". Please add the IS NOT operator here. Interestingly, when doing an advanced search of "electronic collections", you CAN say electronic collection name "IS NOT" X.

    Sean Purcell shared this idea  · 
  13. 24 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Sean Purcell supported this idea  · 
  14. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Sean Purcell commented  · 

    Note that you can grab the "External Name" when using the "Configurations/Retrieve Locations" API call. The downside is this would be an additional API call on top of your Bib call.

    Sean Purcell shared this idea  · 
  15. 93 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Sean Purcell shared this idea  · 
  16. 88 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    Sean Purcell supported this idea  · 
    Sean Purcell shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base