Tracey Middleton
My feedback
14 results found
-
19 votes
Tracey Middleton
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
Tracey Middleton
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
Tracey Middleton
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Tracey Middleton
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
Tracey Middleton
supported this idea
·
-
32 votes
Tracey Middleton
supported this idea
·
-
46 votes
Tracey Middleton
supported this idea
·
-
213 votes
Dear colleagues,
Thanks you for suggesting this idea.
After reading it carefully, my understanding is that the need is for a new “entity” which will serve as a “bridge” between encumbrance and expenditure. This bridge will be named “Pending invoices”.
Any POL which is invoiced will be disencumbered and the amount will be added to the “pending invoices balance”. When an invoice is approved, the amount should be reduced from the “pending invoices balance” and added as an expenditure.
- Is this understanding correct?
- Do you think that the definition of using this "bridge" should be in institution level, or might be different from invoice to invoice?
Please note that this is a complicated addition. We will need to define the behavior in rollover, and in any place that changes balances etc.
Thanks for your collaboration,
Tamar Fuches
Alma product team
An error occurred while saving the comment
Tracey Middleton
commented
Hi Tamar - agree with Oliver and Tom - it needs to be simple. Our preference would be for transactions to remain as encumbrances until the invoice is approved. No need to for a 'bridge' status.
Tracey Middleton
shared this idea
·
-
10 votes
Tracey Middleton
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Tracey Middleton
supported this idea
·
-
127 votes
Tracey Middleton
supported this idea
·
-
29 votes
Tracey Middleton
supported this idea
·
-
76 votes
Tracey Middleton
supported this idea
·
-
63 votes
Tracey Middleton
supported this idea
·
This is a great idea.