RapidILL
Your feedback matters to us. Help us improve RapidILL by telling us what you’d like to see using the message areas below. You can also can support something already posted.
We would love to be able to respond to every idea that is submitted, but this is not feasible. We are, however, committed to responding to the most popular ideas—those that have received the most points.
For more information please review our FAQ and guidelines. Thank you.
4 results found
-
Don't loose patron information by accident
If you by accident change the status on a request that's not RapidILL to Request Completed, then all information about the who ordered the material is lost, even if it's only a few minutes. There gotta be a way to retrieve that information and undo that mistake.
3 votes -
"Send query to patron" is visible in attachments
When you send an e-mail to patron using the "Send query to patron"-function in Alma it would be useful if that e-mail is later visible in attachments, so that other colleagues might see exactly what have been said.
3 votes -
Alma/Rapido notes: Reason for rejection should be passed on through RapidILL
Currently, the only notes passed on in a RapidILL-Alma integration are notes given as part of the bad citation workflow.
However, as borrowing library, in order to reasonably notify the patron why a request is rejected, the note containing the reason for the rejection by the lending library also needs to be passed on into the borrower's Alma/Rapido.181 votes -
Rapidill discrepancy between the date in Alma and on Rapidill web input.
We are getting requests come through Alma that are lacking information compared to their web version counterparts. In both of these cases in the Alma version we have only got the year of the article which is why we have marked them as a ‘bad citation’ and referred them back to the requester. However, when looking at the Web instance a few minutes later which is not enough time for the request to have been updated, we can see the date information in full. Granted it is in the ‘year’ section however, the concatenation could be causing problems with other…
3 votes
- Don't see your idea?