dave allen
My feedback
27 results found
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1 vote
dave allen shared this idea ·
-
3 votes
dave allen shared this idea ·
-
17 votes
dave allen supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment dave allen commented
This is an important idea as it can be used as part of teh DEI (Diversity , Equity and Inclsuiveness) project that is being run with Ex Libris
-
3 votes
dave allen shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
dave allen shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
dave allen shared this idea ·
-
4 votes
dave allen shared this idea ·
-
4 votes
dave allen shared this idea ·
-
7 votes
dave allen shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
dave allen shared this idea ·
-
4 votes
dave allen shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
dave allen shared this idea ·
-
4 votes
dave allen shared this idea ·
-
4 votes
dave allen shared this idea ·
-
2 votes
dave allen shared this idea ·
-
114 votes
Hello everyone,
Regarding the request for this idea, could you please provide more details on the use case? According to the MARC21 standard, the Dewey Decimal Classification Number is located in field 082, which is why we allow browsing of data from 082 $a and $b. Additionally, we have incorporated the Locally Assigned Dewey Call Number from field 092 $a and $b into this browsing option (full details can be found on the Alma online help page).
However, fields 676 and 410 according to the MARC21 standard are not Dewey fields.
dave allen supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment dave allen commented
submitted to the community as part of the DIWG 2018 enhancement request -- results are as follows
High => 20.0%
Med => 13.3%
Low => 46.7%
N/A => 6.7%
Intersted => 6.7%dave allen shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment dave allen commented
submitted to the community as part of the DIWG 2018 enhancement request -- results are as foloows
High => 26.7%
Med => 13.3%
Low => 20.0%
N/A => 20.0%
Intersted => 20.0%An error occurred while saving the comment dave allen commented
questions raised by DIWG on this request is actually a defect
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment dave allen commented
submitted to the community as part of the DIWG 2018 enhancement request -- results are as foloows
High => 26.7%
Med => 20.0%
Low => 13.3%
N/A => 33.3%
Intersted => 6.7%dave allen shared this idea ·
we have changed direction since 2019 and are looking at the IIIF Universal Viewer