Anita Fraunberger
My feedback
5 results found
-
15 votes
Anita Fraunberger
supported this idea
·
-
72 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anita Fraunberger
supported this idea
·
-
27 votes
Anita Fraunberger
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anita Fraunberger
commented
I can confirm that the import profile type "Repository" is not adequate to a data model where a separate holding for every single item is used. In our case, the import profile use an existing holding, instead of generating a new one. It would be desirable if the import profile offered a choice regarding the data model used.
-
57 votes
Anita Fraunberger
supported this idea
·
-
136 votes
Anita Fraunberger
shared this idea
·
We currently record the primary call number in MARC 852 $h and the secondary call number in field 'Item call number'. As the 'Item Call Number' is not included in the Browse Shelf Listing, we plan to convert this data to MARC 852 $j. However, as things stand at present, this would only bring about a minor improvement.
The ability to search and browse all call numbers in a single index is highly desirable.