Lachlan McKinni
My feedback
7 results found
-
7 votes
AdminTami Ezra
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Removing the "accepted" status so that institution can continue voting as agreed with the PWG.
Lachlan McKinni
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
AdminTami Ezra
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Removing the "accepted" status so that institution can continue voting as agreed with the PWG.
Lachlan McKinni
supported this idea
·
-
31 votes
AdminTami Ezra
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Removing the "accepted" status so that institution can continue voting as agreed with the PWG.
Lachlan McKinni
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Lachlan McKinni
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
AdminTami Ezra
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Removing the "accepted" status so that institution can continue voting as agreed with the PWG.
Lachlan McKinni
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
AdminTami Ezra
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Removing the "accepted" status so that institution can continue voting as agreed with the PWG.
An error occurred while saving the comment
Lachlan McKinni
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
Lachlan McKinni
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Lachlan McKinni
commented
This would be greatly beneficial for both back-end and front-end users of Esploro powered repositories, especially if it also shows up on the asset descriptions before the asset itself is accessed (similar to how DOI, Publisher, etc is shown on the asset label in the menus).
I think that this should be an optional display parameter, so that for researchers who want their drafts shown can have them, but that it is not an automatic function for all assets.