Skip to content

Pam Williamson

← Have an idea for Ex Libris?

My feedback

8 results found

  1. Allow us to suppress the License from display when it is not ready with status of "Draft" or review status "In review"

    37 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Resource Management - Electronic  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Pam Williamson supported this idea  · 

  2. Add "Which coverage statement will be applied?" option to "Change Electronic portfolio information" job

    88 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Resource Management - Electronic  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Pam Williamson supported this idea  · 

  3. Make it possible to add Vendor Interface fields and customize field value options for existing fields

    204 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Alma » Acquisition - Vendors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    AdminTamar Fuches (Alma product manager, Ex Libris) responded

    Hi Elizabeth, Katie, and everyone,

    Thanks so much for sharing this idea!

    From what I understand, it includes two main parts:

    1. Allowing institutions to edit the list of values in various fields, with a specific example being the “Implemented Authorization Method” field.
    2. Adding more fields and making them reportable in Analytics, along with a request for a flexible mechanism to support this.

    Regarding the second point — adding a flexible mechanism is quite a complex change and could impact the timeline.

    If you can point out around three specific fields that are most important to add first, it might be easier.

    Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!

    Thanks again,

    Tamar

    Pam Williamson supported this idea  · 

  4. Simplify item scanning when processing is complete

    88 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Resource Management - Physical  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Pam Williamson supported this idea  · 

  5. Pin POL notes to top of list

    122 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Pam Williamson supported this idea  · 

  6. Notes in POL's should only be for notes (not history)

    165 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Alma » Acquisition - PO & POLine  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Under Review  ·  AdminZohar Shemesh (zohar.shemesh@exlibrisgroup.com, Ex Libris) responded

    Dear all,

    Thank you for sharing this idea.

    I have read it carefully, and would like to make sure that I understand it:

    Current situation:

    There are several processes in PO line workflow which add automatic internal notes, for example:

    - Renewal ("PO Line has been renewed automatically on…")

    - Moving PO line out of PO (""Line was removed from Order ...")

    - other.

    Desired outcome:

    Have a configurable option to disable these notes from being created. Each of these processes is/will be saved in the PO line history.

    Please let me know if this understanding is correct.

    Thanks,

    Zohar Shemesh

    Alma product team

    Pam Williamson supported this idea  · 

  7. Make is possible to display Available From Date and Available To Date to users in Primo

    60 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Pam Williamson supported this idea  · 

  8. Provide a solution to use POLs in context of Auto Holdings collections

    30 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Acquisition - PO & POLine  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Pam Williamson supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)