Sandra Wong
My feedback
9 results found
-
3 votes
AdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Sandra Wong
shared this idea
·
-
79 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sandra Wong
shared this idea
·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Sandra Wong
commented
According to a reply from a support case:
To duplicate the Primo UI's 'npsearch', you can add the parameters &newspapersSearch=true and &pcAvailability=true to the regular search API parameters.
Please update documentation on the Developers Network: https://developers.exlibrisgroup.com/primo/apis/search/
And update this Idea. I have removed my votes
Sandra Wong
shared this idea
·
-
154 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sandra Wong
commented
Logged in - a user's email is autopopulated in the "To" field - but if they change it to a different email address, the recipient does not know who sent the email. There is not enough text space to add instructions to the "Notes" section of the function to give users directions to include their own contact if they change the to: email address.
For non-logged in users, if the user doesn't email it to themselves, it would be helpful to have both a To: field and a From: field. I think allowing "Notes" to non-logged in users would also be helpful. The function here should be the same whether logged in or not - with the "To" field auto-populated when logged in.
Thanks for considering. I agree with the other comments - that logged in users may not know that their own contact info is not included when they send these emails from Primo to library email addresses.
Thank you.
Sandra Wong
supported this idea
·
-
145 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sandra Wong
commented
I agree. I think it would be useful to have the lateral links enabled when viewing a journal record from an AtoZ journal search result. This different behaviour seems unexpected when it looks to me like the record is exactly the same whether you do an AtoZ search or if you do a Basic/Advanced search.
Thanks for considering.
Sandra Wong
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Hello,
I am pleased to inform the the journal and books collections were added to the knowledgebases.
A legal agreement is being negotiated to add the CDI metadata.
Kind regards,
Tamar
Sandra Wong
shared this idea
·
-
41 votesSandra Wong
supported this idea
·
-
296 votes
Dear Alma Community,
I am writing to inform you of a recent change that affects the status of an enhancement you have created or supported in the Idea Exchange.
As part of our ongoing commitment to align our internal development processes and increase roadmap transparency with our community, some Ideas that were previously marked as “Planned” have been reassigned a status of “Accepted”.
The “Accepted” status signifies that the Alma Product Management team recognizes the value of these Ideas and is committed to their development. However, enhancements are not expected to make it onto The Roadmap in the next year.
We believe that this change will ultimately benefit our user community by providing a more realistic and transparent view of Alma development. We appreciate your understanding and patience as we implement this change.
We understand that this change may lead to disappointment or frustration, and we sincerely apologize for any…
Sandra Wong
supported this idea
·
-
62 votesSandra Wong
shared this idea
·
Here's one:
https://sfu-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/15tu09f/01SFUL_ALMA21421116670003611
020 ##$a9781517908751$qhardcover [no image]
020 ##$a1517908752$qhardcover [no image]
020 ##$a9781517908768$qpaperback [image avail]
020 ##$a1517908760$qpaperback [image avail]
https://syndetics.com/index.aspx?isbn=9781517908768/SC.JPG&client=primo
https://syndetics.com/index.aspx?isbn=1517908760/SC.JPG&client=primo