Esther Ernst
My feedback
11 results found
-
261 votes
Hello everyone, for those who raised comments about the correction of 830 $v, could you please provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of the scenario in which this subfield gets overwritten?
Esther Ernst
supported this idea
·
-
151 votes
I wonder if this request takes into account that certain fields in the 1XX/6XX/7XX have different first indicator definitions in the MARC21 standard for Bibliographic fields compared to their corresponding Authority fields. In such cases, copying the first indicator from the Authority to the Bibliographic heading would result in incorrect data. Is the reqeust is about Names only? Hans, I would recommend consulting with AAFG group for a detailed spec where this requested behavior is valid to which fields.
An error occurred while saving the comment Esther Ernst
supported this idea
·
-
107 votes
As you all know, the Community Zone content is shared among all Alma customers, each with different requirements. Therefore, I’m not sure this request would be acceptable to the wider Alma community. That said, if there were a consensus on a closed list of fields that CZ bibliographic records should be restricted from deleting per MARC profile, this capability already exists and is managed by the Ex Libris Content Operations team. Unfortunately, this is not available for authorities. Do you think such a consensus could be reached?
An error occurred while saving the comment Esther Ernst
commented
Blocking the "Delete record" functionality for GND-records would save precious time and work that we spend for troubleshooting, so we would really appreciate this possibility.
Esther Ernst
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesEsther Ernst
supported this idea
·
-
118 votesEsther Ernst
supported this idea
·
-
239 votesEsther Ernst
supported this idea
·
-
80 votesEsther Ernst
supported this idea
·
-
79 votesEsther Ernst
supported this idea
·
-
41 votesEsther Ernst
supported this idea
·
-
441 votes
This idea is under review for the NDE UI
Esther Ernst
supported this idea
·
-
51 votesEsther Ernst
supported this idea
·
Having to set the first indicator manually when linking a bibliographic field with an authority record is a huge source of mistakes. It would save a lot of time to the data cleaning teams and to the cataloguers, as well as significantly improve data quality, if the first indicator could be copied into the bibliographic field automatically from the authority record by linking with F3.