mcorby

My feedback

  1. 44 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Alma » Acquisitions  ·  Admin →
    mcorby commented  · 

    I heartily agree with this suggestion. I am currently creating hundreds of item records for an analyzed set. When I click to add an item record, the only field populated is the material type. This is the default material type set for the institution, which is book. If I were working on issues for a periodical run, I have to change this every time from book to issue. It would be great if we had the option to easily change our own default preferences as needed. Some days I work on books, some days I work on scores, CDs, or periodicals. I would like to change the Copy ID, Item policy, Is magnetic, and pieces one time (at the beginning of that days workflow). After scanning in the barcode, the item could be complete. A default template would greatly enhance the time it takes to make multiple item records that are the same, except for the barcode.

  2. 327 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    mcorby commented  · 

    At this time, we can use the advanced search for physical items and search for information in the Public note, Fulfillment note, Internal note 1, 2, & 3. It would be great if we can search by Statistics Note 1, 2, & 3 as well, with the same search options as the Internal notes.

    mcorby supported this idea  · 
  3. 153 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    mcorby commented  · 

    We also need the ability to search by Statistical Note 1, 2, or 3 in Almas Advanced search. We can currently search by Internal note 1, 2, or 3, and it would be useful to search by Statistical Notes as well.

    mcorby supported this idea  · 
  4. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    mcorby commented  · 

    I agree. I don't have any votes left, but I've been working on a similar Analytics report as well. I would also really like to know which e-collections are locally created and which e-collections are from the CZ.

  5. 102 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    mcorby commented  · 

    I think this would be a great addition to the jobs list. We could create sets for specific records based on location and resource type. If the job used the Update Item paramaters, we could apply the same item policy, material type, notes, etc. to each newly created item record in the set. The barcode could be left blank, use a phrase to indicate the item was generated, or something else.

    mcorby supported this idea  · 
  6. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    mcorby shared this idea  · 
  7. 80 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    mcorby shared this idea  · 
  8. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    mcorby supported this idea  · 
  9. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    mcorby supported this idea  · 
  10. 160 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    mcorby supported this idea  · 
  11. 53 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    mcorby supported this idea  · 
  12. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    mcorby supported this idea  · 
    mcorby commented  · 

    We also need the option to exclude deleted holdings from our Analytics reports. We have the "In repository/Deleted" option for bib records. We need the same option for holdings records. At the moment, we are getting false hits for deleted holdings on our analytics reports.

  13. 49 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    mcorby supported this idea  · 
  14. 57 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    mcorby supported this idea  · 
    mcorby commented  · 

    I agree with this option. I would like to add, as soon as the NO button for "Item is in temporary location" is selected, this should clear all of the temporary options in this section. As soon as the YES button for "Item is in temporary location" is selected, the temp lib and temp loc should be required fields, while the other fields are optional.

  15. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    mcorby shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base