Rialto
Your feedback matters to us. Help us improve Rialto by telling us what you’d like to see using the message areas below. You can also can support something already posted.
We would love to be able to respond to every idea that is submitted, but this is not feasible. We are, however, committed to responding to the most popular ideas—those that have received the most points.
For more information please review our FAQ and guidelines. Thank you.
139 results found
-
Allow multiple holdings on the same import job
Multiple copies for the same title under different library locations processed on the same import job, fail to update bib correctly.
When multiple bib records within the same import job for the same title are imported from the system, only the first record from the file is merged with the bib record, and all subsequent records (for other libraries or locations) are matched and skipped.
57 votes -
Add Reporting Codes as a drop down field when selecting item for DDA
At the point of adding a title to DDA, a drop down field would be beneficial to input Reporting Codes so when a title is triggered this information pulls through into the POL which we wish to use to report from.
26 votes -
Enable authentication on purchase request web form
The customization options on the purchase request web form are great, but we cannot use it until the requestor can authenticate. We need to know who they are.
At present they appear as "Guest" in the request. An accident waiting to happen - when we update the requester to the wrong person.
Also we would only want this service available to institutional members, and would want to avoid mischievous use by unknown persons.34 votes -
Notify customers when platform vendors reject a DDA title in Rialto
When a librarian adds titles to the DDA pool and they disappear because the platform vendor has removed them, librarians want to be notified. Librarians are losing track of what has been lost. They recently become aware of lost titles because of titles that were special requests. After these became known, and it was discovered that this list was growing, a concern for untracked titles developed. How many pushed DDA titles go missing? All selectors who push DDA titles need to be sent a regular monthly report by email of the titles that were removed.
11 votes -
Display Rialto/ProQuest prices in the Keylinks acquisition price checker
Within Keylinks (Kortext) reading lists, GOBI and Browns price information is integrated in the price checker acquisitions module. Rialto market information should also be integrated here.
11 votes -
Keylinks integration in Rialto
Display reading list information within Rialto, from the Keylinks (Kortext) reading list system:
- Add a tag within the market listing, similar to the "in your institution" tag and "in my lists" Leganto tag
- Make this tag clickable and display the reading list information (e.g. module code, name)
11 votes -
Separate finalizing stage from Purchase Request form page with confirmation message and link to create new request
Currently, the finalizing stage is completed on the same page as the rest of the form. However, I believe it would be more effective if the message of finalization appeared on a different, separate page, where the patron doesn't see the request fields. This separation would provide a clearer distinction between the completion of the form and the finalization process.
Additionally, I recommend adding a link in the finalizing stage page, that allows the user to create a new Purchase Request.
I believe these enhancements would improve the user experience and make the process more transparent and user-friendly.
16 votes -
Make "In Your Institution" clearer
It would be great if we could more clearly differentiate when we hold the current edition listed in the marketplace verses a previous edition. We don't want to see items in a feed when we already hold a current edition, but we're likely to update editions when we already hold previous editions. Right now the amount of clicking needed and the location of that information is difficult for selectors to find.
27 votes -
Automatically remove titles that no long meet DDA Selection Plan criteria from Rialto DDA pool, Ebook Central/LibCentral and Alma repository
When a DDA title increases in cost so it exceeds the maximum cost we set for our DDA, it becomes untriggerable and inaccessible on the Ebook Central platform, but the title remains in our DDA pool in Rialto and our Alma holdings, so users can find the title in Primo but cannot access it. Removing these titles requires a cumbersome manual workflow. This enhancement would make it so titles that no longer meet our DDA selection plan criteria are removed from our DDA pool automatically in Rialto, Ebook Central/LibCentral, and in the Alma repository.This would ensure users don't discover inaccessible…
16 votes -
Add fields to My List export
When staff collate items in a list they use the comments field extensively. When the list is exported to excel the comments are not included. Can the comments field be added to the export?
3 votes -
Need an API that we could search using ISBN that would tell us what we own in E and P and also tell us what is available to purchase
Need an API that we could search using ISBN or a few other select identifiers that would tell us what we own in E and P and also tell us what is available to purchase with format, price and licensing info. It would also be necessary to have the search function similarly to the way it does in Rialto with a fuzzy match/FRBR type logic based on an exact match option or fuzzy match option in the API call. It would also be desired to perhaps then be able to "batch" order a set of the items after processing either…
4 votes -
Internal item specific notes for titles on lists
It would be great if internal notes could be added to specific items that have been added to lists, with only ppl with access to said list(s) able to see the notes. This feature would be useful for rush/reserve/replacement/special orders when the selector needs to communicate information specific to the item.
1 vote -
Rialto Market to Alma Purchase Request Crosswalk
When Selectors put purchase requests through the Alma Purchase Request form the Purchasing Manager can push the request to Rialto Market. But when Selectors put something in Rialto Market the Purchasing Manager cannot push it to Alma Purchasing Request form. This would be extremely helpful and eliminate the need to go into Rialto, cancel the order and re-create it from scratch in the Alma Purchase Request form.
3 votes -
"Buy it Now" option in Selection Plan
We received a request for purchase from a patron for an ebook which is in our current batch of selection plan titles in review so if we do nothing it will ship, which is fine.
My question is on the Purchase title button. I had hoped that this would act as a Buy It Now option such that with a click, Rialto would deliver immediately, the selection plan profiled "copy" of the book.
However, It seems that Purchase Title simply moves the order to the firm order workflow, thus requiring manual (or template) entry of the ordering library, fund, report…
1 vote -
Automate workflows for approving or denying alternate editions, and over price threshold
Right now all this happens via email. It's a cumbersome process and the email only goes to the person who approved the order. If the approval or denial could be integrated into the Rialto workflow process others from the institution could respond.
1 vote -
Continuous, dynamic DDA deduping based on Alma holdings
Currently, if a book is in our DDA pool, and then we acquire it in another Alma collection, the book remains in our DDA pool (allowing us to trigger a book we already have) unless we follow a tedious manual process for identifying and removing such books from the DDA pool. This enhancement would make it so our Alma holdings "talk back" to LibCentral, so if we get a new book, and if that book is in our DDA pool, it is automatically removed from the DDA pool in Rialto, Ebook Central/LibCentral, and in the Alma repository.This would reduce the…
12 votes -
Add LC classification "F" in drop down menu in Market Search
When doing an advanced search in Market for LC Classification, the "F" is hidden in the drop-down menu under the "E - History: America" classification. Would make more sense to have it as a standalone menu option. Or, rename the E menu option to say E and F. Otherwise, it looks like the F classification is not available to search.
1 vote -
Recents option when adding funds
When adding to DDA can the funds selection have a "recents" option so we can select the most used fund, rather than having to scroll down the list of funds available
3 votes -
Add facets to Order History filters: Total Amount & Date range
Add facets to Order History filters to include:
Total Amount and Date range (fiscal year)1 vote -
Add multiple recomendation profiles
We’d like the ability to overlay multiple recommendation profiles, similar to overlaying multiple ordering templates. This would save time by allowing users to mix subject based (LC, Dewey, subject, etc.) profiles with quality/technical profiles (Award winners, review, readership level, publish/released time frame, etc.) instead of having to re-add multiple technical criteria to every subject specific list they want, this would be especially helpful for criteria like reviews which have to be typed in separately each time.
3 votes
- Don't see your idea?