Separating Scholarly and Peer Reviewed facets in the PCI
As a former Summon library, we are lamenting that there used to be separate facets in Summon for Scholarly and for Peer-reviewed articles - as not all peer-reviewed content is scholarly. Ex Libris has responded to my Salesforce inquiry that there are no current plans to separate this content into separate facets, but the idea may be considered for the CDI roadmap.
Rob Kelshian
shared this idea
Hello All,
This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 30 votes.
This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.
We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Primo.
Best regards,
Primo Product Team
-
Gwendolyn Reece
commented
I had asked for this discussion based on the fact that there is oil and gas industry climate denial literature that is apparently using a "peer review" model. I think it is important to be able to get the cross-section between the scholarly and peer review in order to weed out things of this nature that have figured out how to game the system. This was discovered when a student was sent to us by a professor for using non-scholarly material in a paper...and it was from the oil and gas industry trade magazines.