How can we improve Primo?

Separating Scholarly and Peer Reviewed facets in the PCI

As a former Summon library, we are lamenting that there used to be separate facets in Summon for Scholarly and for Peer-reviewed articles - as not all peer-reviewed content is scholarly. Ex Libris has responded to my Salesforce inquiry that there are no current plans to separate this content into separate facets, but the idea may be considered for the CDI roadmap.

14 votes
Vote
Sign in
(thinking…)
Sign in with: facebook google
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
Rob Kelshian shared this idea  ·   ·  Admin →

1 comment

Sign in
(thinking…)
Sign in with: facebook google
Signed in as (Sign out)
Submitting...
  • Gwendolyn Reece commented  · 

    I had asked for this discussion based on the fact that there is oil and gas industry climate denial literature that is apparently using a "peer review" model. I think it is important to be able to get the cross-section between the scholarly and peer review in order to weed out things of this nature that have figured out how to game the system. This was discovered when a student was sent to us by a professor for using non-scholarly material in a paper...and it was from the oil and gas industry trade magazines.

Feedback and Knowledge Base