Camille Ghelfi
My feedback
8 results found
-
1 vote
Camille Ghelfi shared this idea ·
-
3 votes
Camille Ghelfi shared this idea ·
-
146 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Camille Ghelfi supported this idea ·
-
261 votes
Hello everyone, for those who raised comments about the correction of 830 $v, could you please provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of the scenario in which this subfield gets overwritten?
An error occurred while saving the comment Camille Ghelfi commented
Protects data from accidental manipulation and enables higher quality. This eliminates time-consuming troubleshooting and correction work.
Camille Ghelfi supported this idea ·
-
1 vote
Camille Ghelfi shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
Camille Ghelfi shared this idea ·
-
21 votes
Camille Ghelfi supported this idea ·
-
151 votes
I wonder if this request takes into account that certain fields in the 1XX/6XX/7XX have different first indicator definitions in the MARC21 standard for Bibliographic fields compared to their corresponding Authority fields. In such cases, copying the first indicator from the Authority to the Bibliographic heading would result in incorrect data. Is the reqeust is about Names only? Hans, I would recommend consulting with AAFG group for a detailed spec where this requested behavior is valid to which fields.
Camille Ghelfi supported this idea ·
It improves quality when more cases are recorded using Linking Job, Authority Control Task List, and Preferred Term Correction. It also makes it easier to work with the ACTL when only “genuinely” incorrect cases are recorded.