Camille Ghelfi
My feedback
7 results found
-
145 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
258 votes
Hello everyone, for those who raised comments about the correction of 830 $v, could you please provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of the scenario in which this subfield gets overwritten?
An error occurred while saving the comment Protects data from accidental manipulation and enables higher quality. This eliminates time-consuming troubleshooting and correction work.
-
187 votes
Hello all,
We are currently reviewing it to assess its technical feasibility and implications. We’ll follow up once we have more clarity.
An error occurred while saving the comment It would be a huge benefit for the usability of Authority Control Task List, if it were possible to sort the items by the content of ALL the columns that are available (especially BIB headings and Report Type) instead of having this option only available for title, MMS-ID and date.
-
1 vote
-
1 vote
-
21 votes
-
148 votes
I wonder if this request takes into account that certain fields in the 1XX/6XX/7XX have different first indicator definitions in the MARC21 standard for Bibliographic fields compared to their corresponding Authority fields. In such cases, copying the first indicator from the Authority to the Bibliographic heading would result in incorrect data. Is the reqeust is about Names only? Hans, I would recommend consulting with AAFG group for a details spec where this requested behavior is valid to which fields.
It improves quality when more cases are recorded using Linking Job, Authority Control Task List, and Preferred Term Correction. It also makes it easier to work with the ACTL when only “genuinely” incorrect cases are recorded.