Floriane Pochon Levit
My feedback
18 results found
-
24 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Floriane Pochon Levit
commented
Hi Stacey, in Primo VE the fields are not merged, by default only the metadata of the first record in the result list is displayed, or the Alma-P/E/D record if you choose this option.
For example, we chose to display always Alma-P records because we think that our local fields have to be displayed no matter which keywords were searched, but it means that we loose all the metadata from the CZ records (like description in 520 fields). We think it would be more appropriate to display all the fields from merged records, not making it depend on search keywords.
Floriane Pochon Levit
shared this idea
·
-
21 votesFloriane Pochon Levit
shared this idea
·
-
392 votesFloriane Pochon Levit
supported this idea
·
-
Display related holdings for monographs only for the 773 $w relation and not for the 8xx $w relation
658 votesHi all,
We are currently reviewing this idea together with Alma.
We will update with any new information we have.
Best regards,
Yael.
Floriane Pochon Levit
supported this idea
·
-
154 votesFloriane Pochon Levit
supported this idea
·
-
67 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Floriane Pochon Levit
commented
@Stacey You are right I should have chosen a different category. About the lateral link, that's a great idea, unfortunately in our environment it would not work - with several Primo views sharing the same IZ, we can't retrieve the view code from the collection ID.
Floriane Pochon Levit
shared this idea
·
-
16 votesFloriane Pochon Levit
shared this idea
·
-
305 votesFloriane Pochon Levit
supported this idea
·
-
141 votesFloriane Pochon Levit
supported this idea
·
-
167 votesFloriane Pochon Levit
supported this idea
·
-
228 votesFloriane Pochon Levit
supported this idea
·
-
79 votesFloriane Pochon Levit
supported this idea
·
-
794 votes
Thanks for the examples - we will review them and discuss our options.
Best,
Tamar
Floriane Pochon Levit
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesFloriane Pochon Levit
supported this idea
·
-
230 votesFloriane Pochon Levit
supported this idea
·
-
109 votesFloriane Pochon Levit
shared this idea
·
-
41 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Floriane Pochon Levit
commented
We would also like that e-resource records appears only in search results of users whose IP address belongs to IP range defined for the corresponding Inventory Network Group
Floriane Pochon Levit
supported this idea
·
-
40 votesFloriane Pochon Levit
supported this idea
·
Hi Stacey, so sorry I didn't see your answer. Better late than never… Here is an example of a deduped record (physical and electronic version of a book) where the difference is quite obvious : 1/ Record in our default search profile where the Alma-P record is displayed (without the OA logo on the Brief record display) https://renouvaud1.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/search?query=any,contains,Histoire%20du%20sport%20de%20l'Antiquit%C3%A9%20au%20XIXe%20si%C3%A8cle%201984&tab=Everything&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&vid=41BCULAUSA_LIB:VU2 and 2/ Record in our e-resources search profile where the Alma-E record is displayed with the OA logo (added through a 506 field) : https://renouvaud1.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/search?query=any,contains,Histoire%20du%20sport%20de%20l'Antiquit%C3%A9%20au%20XIXe%20si%C3%A8cle%201984&tab=Online_resources&search_scope=ALL_RN&vid=41BCULAUSA_LIB:VU2 . We chose to display the Alma-P record in our default search profile as we find that our local records are usually better than CZ ones, but we would like that important information such as the OA logo be displayed as well.