Skip to content

Gail Bonath

My feedback

4 results found

  1. 201 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Gail Bonath supported this idea  · 
  2. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Gail Bonath supported this idea  · 
  3. 39 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Gail Bonath supported this idea  · 
  4. 82 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Gail Bonath supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gail Bonath commented  · 

    Our library recently went live with Primo VE. In Primo VE the 245 subfield c does NOT display, and there is no way to configure it ourselves. It is hard coded and not configurable. Our records look like the one Lori linked to above.

    I think this is a huge problem and actually I think it is a mistake. Most other MARC fields include all subfields.

Feedback and Knowledge Base