Kurt Vollmerhause (QUT)
My feedback
6 results found
-
21 votes
Kurt Vollmerhause (QUT) supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
83 votes
Kurt Vollmerhause (QUT) supported this idea ·
-
47 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Kurt Vollmerhause (QUT) commented
Supported. The institutional delete user policy should be applied consistently, regardless of the method used for removal. There are often use cases in which it is inefficient to deploy the Purge Users job for only a single identified user record, or a small number of records, which might better be deleted manually. An example for our institution is the annual purge process for community cohorts such as alumni, which (from Analytics reporting) may well produce only a few candidates for removal.
Kurt Vollmerhause (QUT) supported this idea ·
-
29 votes
Kurt Vollmerhause (QUT) supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Kurt Vollmerhause (QUT) commented
This would be a useful enhancement, especially when the sandbox (whether standard or premium) is being used extensively for testing prior to implementation of a new service/product in the production environment.
-
76 votes
Kurt Vollmerhause (QUT) supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Kurt Vollmerhause (QUT) commented
Supported, this is a key requirement.
-
19 votes
Kurt Vollmerhause (QUT) supported this idea ·
Agreed, this would provide Admins greater transparency and control over granular user permissions in Alma.