Alberto Rovelli
My feedback
7 results found
-
41 votes
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
91 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Dear Moshe,
I have wrongly written this sentence: instead of "records without physical item OF electronic/digital services", I meant "records without physical item OR electronic/digital services".
In fact, we have many records without physical item OR electronic/digital services (i.e. the title of academic theses that are not available, or "parent" records for level cataloguing). For these records, we need to show in Primo VE the title, but don't want to let patrons make any ILL request.
We hope now the Idea is clearer; if not, don't hesitate to ask again.
Thanks and regards -
284 votes
-
65 votes
-
114 votes
Hello everyone,
Regarding the request for this idea, could you please provide more details on the use case? According to the MARC21 standard, the Dewey Decimal Classification Number is located in field 082, which is why we allow browsing of data from 082 $a and $b. Additionally, we have incorporated the Locally Assigned Dewey Call Number from field 092 $a and $b into this browsing option (full details can be found on the Alma online help page).
However, fields 676 and 410 according to the MARC21 standard are not Dewey fields.
-
43 votes
Thank you Moshe, but the meaning of this idea is to check an option, in Anonymization job, to delete the attachments ONLY for expired users, avoiding deleteng every letter after a retention period.
Thanks and regards,
Alberto & Stefano