Sebastian Aigner
My feedback
8 results found
-
258 votes
Hello everyone, for those who raised comments about the correction of 830 $v, could you please provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of the scenario in which this subfield gets overwritten?
An error occurred while saving the comment Sebastian Aigner
shared this idea
·
-
145 votesSebastian Aigner
shared this idea
·
-
187 votes
Hello all,
We are currently reviewing it to assess its technical feasibility and implications. We’ll follow up once we have more clarity.
An error occurred while saving the comment Sebastian Aigner
commented
It would indeed be very helpful, if all the columns could be sorted!
Sebastian Aigner
supported this idea
·
-
103 votes
As you all know, the Community Zone content is shared among all Alma customers, each with different requirements. Therefore, I’m not sure this request would be acceptable to the wider Alma community. That said, if there were a consensus on a closed list of fields that CZ bibliographic records should be restricted from deleting per MARC profile, this capability already exists and is managed by the Ex Libris Content Operations team. Unfortunately, this is not available for authorities. Do you think such a consensus could be reached?
An error occurred while saving the comment Sebastian Aigner
commented
In the GND context, it causes problems when colleagues use the "Delete Record" functionality via "Record Actions", because it changes the LDR in a way that is not compatible with how records are deleted in the GND master file. It therefore sends these records into limbo, since they are neither available in the Alma-GND-mirror, nor are they actually deleted in the master file.
Sebastian Aigner
supported this idea
·
-
118 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sebastian Aigner
commented
It would be great, if such an "edit" button could also be implemented along the already existing "copy" button, when one choses "view" to take a look at a linked authority record upon using the F3 functionality (BIB-F3 aus well as F3 in the 5XX fields of a GND record).
The same goes for viewing a linked authority record when clicking on the binoculars.On all three occasions it would be a huge gain in usabillity if one could directly push the AUTH record in question to the MDE from the view functionality.
Sebastian Aigner
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sebastian Aigner
commented
We would very much appreciate, if CZ records we use were, at least a part of them, were linked to GND records instead of LCNames, since this is the authority file we also use for our own NZ and IZ records.
Sebastian Aigner
supported this idea
·
-
148 votes
I wonder if this request takes into account that certain fields in the 1XX/6XX/7XX have different first indicator definitions in the MARC21 standard for Bibliographic fields compared to their corresponding Authority fields. In such cases, copying the first indicator from the Authority to the Bibliographic heading would result in incorrect data. Is the reqeust is about Names only? Hans, I would recommend consulting with AAFG group for a details spec where this requested behavior is valid to which fields.
An error occurred while saving the comment Sebastian Aigner
commented
It would be of great help if indicators in BIB records were set automatically upon using the F3 functionality. In OBV we are currently checking/setting them via a normalization upon saving the record, but with Drools it is not possible to set them correctly in any case.
Sebastian Aigner
supported this idea
·
-
18 votesSebastian Aigner
supported this idea
·
PTC = Preferred Term Correction (https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Documentation/010Alma_Online_Help_(English)/050Administration/070Managing_Jobs/030Scheduled_Jobs)