Leigh Billings
My feedback
5 results found
-
85 votesLeigh Billings supported this idea ·
-
19 votesLeigh Billings supported this idea ·
-
18 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Leigh Billings supported this idea · -
54 votesLeigh Billings supported this idea ·
-
145 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Leigh Billings commentedIt would be great if I could just uniformly say "don't link unqualified names" rather than having them link and then have to manually review each one to add a differentiating qualifier .... Or even "don't link headings for records that have a certain brief level". Lots of different options could be helpful to prevent erroneous links and thus PTC flips.
Leigh Billings supported this idea ·
Agreed. This is not a significant heading update, and additionally: there is no action that can be taken to fix the punctuation in any case, whether it was removed (like in this case) or added erroneously, because it was done during the automated Preferred Term Correction (PTC) process which relies solely on this punctuation table to add punctuation to updated headings; no matter how many times you try to manually add it back in, the PTC job will remove it the next day. Thus, this unnecessary 'task' is also impossible to complete, and should not appear on the ACTL at all - or, at least, there should be an option to filter/remove punctuation-only changes: https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Documentation/010Alma_Online_Help_(English)/Metadata_Management/060Working_with_Authority_Records#Implemented_Punctuation_Rules_for_Updated_Bibliographic_Records