Skip to content

Leigh Billings

My feedback

5 results found

  1. 85 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Leigh Billings supported this idea  · 
  2. 19 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Leigh Billings supported this idea  · 
  3. 18 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Leigh Billings commented  · 

    Agreed. This is not a significant heading update, and additionally: there is no action that can be taken to fix the punctuation in any case, whether it was removed (like in this case) or added erroneously, because it was done during the automated Preferred Term Correction (PTC) process which relies solely on this punctuation table to add punctuation to updated headings; no matter how many times you try to manually add it back in, the PTC job will remove it the next day. Thus, this unnecessary 'task' is also impossible to complete, and should not appear on the ACTL at all - or, at least, there should be an option to filter/remove punctuation-only changes: https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Documentation/010Alma_Online_Help_(English)/Metadata_Management/060Working_with_Authority_Records#Implemented_Punctuation_Rules_for_Updated_Bibliographic_Records

    Leigh Billings supported this idea  · 
  4. 54 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Leigh Billings supported this idea  · 
  5. 145 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Leigh Billings commented  · 

    It would be great if I could just uniformly say "don't link unqualified names" rather than having them link and then have to manually review each one to add a differentiating qualifier .... Or even "don't link headings for records that have a certain brief level". Lots of different options could be helpful to prevent erroneous links and thus PTC flips.

    Leigh Billings supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base