Jakob Nylin Nilsson

My feedback

  1. 24 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    Jakob Nylin Nilsson supported this idea  · 
  2. 45 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    Jakob Nylin Nilsson supported this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jakob Nylin Nilsson shared this idea  · 
  4. 64 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Alma » Link Resolver  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jakob Nylin Nilsson commented  · 

    Itai and Asaf, I hope you have considered the X-Frame-Options header in your discussion. My experience is that more and more sites use that header. PS. I don't know how this is solved in Serials Solutions.

  5. 36 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jakob Nylin Nilsson shared this idea  · 
  6. 137 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jakob Nylin Nilsson commented  · 

    Systematic reviews are found both under Articles and under Review. I think the reason that we find systematic reviews under Review is a misconception somewhere in the Primo Central Index normalization process. The Cochrane Library is normalized as Articles, so I think the intention of ExLibris is to have Systematic reviews under Articles. Don't you agree? However, I still think it would be nice with a special limit for Systematic reviews, preferably as a sub limit under Articles.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jakob Nylin Nilsson commented  · 

    Another solution would be two have some sort of hierarchy, e.g. you have to choose articles to be able to choose review articles. However, the most important part is that you follow the definitions of the content types. As it is now Primo Central Index has review articles as "articles" and as "reviews".

    Jakob Nylin Nilsson supported this idea  · 
  7. 62 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    Jakob Nylin Nilsson supported this idea  · 
  8. 96 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jakob Nylin Nilsson commented  · 

    I'm sorry bother you with this conversation but since we've started it I think we have to end it. If you want to check with support case 487369, 521088 and 554417 is about this question. The first case was created in November last year. So support haven't been able to solve this in 7 months.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jakob Nylin Nilsson commented  · 

    Did you mean the "Fines/Fees Owner" field in the Fines/Fees Notification Profile Record? I've tried to leave that empty but I'm sorry to say that it doesn't help.

    The documentation says "If left empty, notification is sent for all libraries. " However, I don't think that formulation is very clear. It could mean one letter for all libraries as well as seperate letters for all libraries.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jakob Nylin Nilsson commented  · 

    I can't edit the column Fine/Fee owner on the row Overdue fine. It's says it's updated by the user exl_impl but the support told me that's it's not possible to change. The tables says that "Specific rows can be customized".

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jakob Nylin Nilsson commented  · 

    Yes, I want to configure the 'Fine/Fee owner'. I our case I want fees to be owned by the institution. After that configuration change I expect all users that has an amount bigger or equal to x to get the notification.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jakob Nylin Nilsson commented  · 

    A consequence of this is that when we have a minimum amount x in our Fines/Fees Notification Profile a user can have a total fine of 2x-2 without getting any notification.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jakob Nylin Nilsson commented  · 

    Hi Moshe!

    It's the table found under Alma Configuration > User Management > Patron Charges > Fines/Fees Behaviour. The knowledge center tells me that the table is configurable (https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Materials/050Alma_FAQs/Fulfillment/Fines_and_Fees#How_are_fines_and_fees_managed_in_Alma.3F) but the support told me that is not. The row I want to configure is modified by the user exl_impl and my only possibility is to restore the value.

    Jakob Nylin Nilsson shared this idea  · 
  9. 112 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Alma » Link Resolver  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jakob Nylin Nilsson commented  · 

    I do agree. The bad performance with Pubmed IDs led me to write my own link resolver augmentation: https://gitlab.com/lnu-ub/linkresolver-augmentation/blob/master/pubmed.js

  10. 102 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jakob Nylin Nilsson supported this idea  · 
  11. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jakob Nylin Nilsson supported this idea  · 
    Jakob Nylin Nilsson shared this idea  · 
  12. 18 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jakob Nylin Nilsson shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base