Skip to content

Kevin M. Randall

My feedback

15 results found

  1. 26 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kevin M. Randall commented  · 

    We have certain categories of items to which we do not assign barcodes, and since these cannot be scanned, it appears that the ONLY way to change the process type for these items is to edit each individual item record one by one. The ability to change process type by a batch job would save a ***LOT*** of work. Specifically, idea #1 in Eric's idea would solve this particular problem.

    Kevin M. Randall supported this idea  · 
  2. 26 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Kevin M. Randall supported this idea  · 
  3. 336 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Kevin M. Randall supported this idea  · 
  4. 224 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Dear all, since this idea combines various very different enhancement requests for Alma's normalization rules infrastructure, we are unable to add these to our roadmap at this time. This may change as we get more information on prioritization and needs. In the meantime, we suggest opening dedicated ideas for specific enhancements you would like to promote.

    Kevin M. Randall supported this idea  · 
  5. 14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kevin M. Randall commented  · 

    While this sounds like it might be helpful, I'm trying to figure out how the system would know what limits to put on the exported results. In theory, the results could include the entire database, sorted by the specific elemented being browsed. When putting a value into a browse search, you are telling the system to throw you into that specific spot in the entire index. How far back, and how far forward, should the exported results go? Or is your idea that the export would include only the results currently showing in the results window?

  6. 5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kevin M. Randall commented  · 

    It seems that the "Last updated ..." information in the popup window pertains not to the item record, but to the HOLDINGS record. For instance, today I edited the 866 fields (textual holdings statements) in a holdings record, without touching anything in the 852 field. Then, looking at some of the items, I see that all of the items are showing the date, time, and operator pertaining to the holdings record update. No actions had been taken by me or by a job that would have affected the item records.

    Kevin M. Randall shared this idea  · 
  7. 9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kevin M. Randall commented  · 

    It is currently possible to duplicate a MARC field by copying and pasting. With the cursor anywhere in the field, Edit > Copy, or Ctrl+C, will copy the entire field to the clipboard. Then, Edit > Paste, or Ctrl+V, will paste the field above whatever field the cursor is in.

  8. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Kevin M. Randall supported this idea  · 
  9. 18 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kevin M. Randall commented  · 

    It is already possible to move the item records to either a different holdings record on the same bib ("Change Holdings" button) or a holdings record on a different bib ("Relink to another Bib" button).

  10. 55 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Kevin M. Randall supported this idea  · 
  11. 11 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Kevin M. Randall supported this idea  · 
  12. 16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Kevin M. Randall supported this idea  · 
  13. 94 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Kevin M. Randall supported this idea  · 
  14. 68 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Kevin M. Randall supported this idea  · 
  15. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Kevin M. Randall supported this idea  · 
    Kevin M. Randall shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base