Kevin M. Randall
My feedback
8 results found
-
78 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Kevin M. Randall supported this idea ·
-
26 votes
Kevin M. Randall supported this idea ·
-
218 votes
Hello everyone,
I’d like to share our plans to introduce support for XSL (Extensible Stylesheet Language) normalization rules. This new feature is designed for handling complex normalization tasks. It offers the flexibility of a full programming language, enabling advanced data manipulation. This will complement our existing normalization rules based on DROOLS, maintaining all of its current capabilities.
Would the addition of this new type of normalization rule meet the requirements outlined in this idea?
Kevin M. Randall supported this idea ·
-
18 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Kevin M. Randall commented
It is already possible to move the item records to either a different holdings record on the same bib ("Change Holdings" button) or a holdings record on a different bib ("Relink to another Bib" button).
-
58 votes
Kevin M. Randall supported this idea ·
-
15 votes
Kevin M. Randall supported this idea ·
-
98 votes
Kevin M. Randall supported this idea ·
-
65 votes
Kevin M. Randall supported this idea ·
We have certain categories of items to which we do not assign barcodes, and since these cannot be scanned, it appears that the ONLY way to change the process type for these items is to edit each individual item record one by one. The ability to change process type by a batch job would save a ***LOT*** of work. Specifically, idea #1 in Eric's idea would solve this particular problem.