A Rowe
My feedback
30 results found
-
34 votes
A Rowe
shared this idea
·
-
121 votes
A Rowe
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
16 votes
AdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
A Rowe
supported this idea
·
-
41 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
A Rowe
commented
We would love to see work done to improve the accessibility of this form for users. If the form could be made more customizable we could make some of these improvements ourselves.
A Rowe
supported this idea
·
-
96 votes
A Rowe
supported this idea
·
-
60 votes
A Rowe
shared this idea
·
-
70 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
A Rowe
commented
Agreed. Deleting bibliographic record information to prevent undesirable behaviour is not the way an LMS should work.
We would also love if the related records functionality was optional.
A Rowe
supported this idea
·
-
77 votes
A Rowe
shared this idea
·
-
78 votes
A Rowe
supported this idea
·
A Rowe
shared this idea
·
-
271 votes
A Rowe
supported this idea
·
making the filter options static - including the persistent (lock) option- would go a long way to improving the usability of facets for users.
Too often we hear from students that they didn't know the system could do that. Static filter options (include, exclude, persistent) would enable users to see exactly what the system can do.