maureen.bezanson
My feedback
28 results found
-
5 votesmaureen.bezanson shared this idea ·
-
34 votesmaureen.bezanson supported this idea ·maureen.bezanson shared this idea ·
-
15 votesAdminTami Ezra (Admin, Ex Libris) responded
Removing the "accepted" status so that institution can continue voting as agreed with the PWG.
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment maureen.bezanson commentedI agree that existing supervision that has already been entered as a supervision on the ETD asset should be displayed somewhere on the profile, and as part of the activities makes sense.
-
4 votesmaureen.bezanson supported this idea ·
-
9 votesAdminTami Ezra (Admin, Ex Libris) responded
Removing the "accepted" status so that institution can continue voting as agreed with the PWG.
maureen.bezanson supported this idea · -
33 votesAdminTami Ezra (Admin, Ex Libris) responded
Removing the "accepted" status so that institution can continue voting as agreed with the PWG.
maureen.bezanson supported this idea · -
15 votesAdminTami Ezra (Admin, Ex Libris) responded
Removing the "accepted" status so that institution can continue voting as agreed with the PWG.
maureen.bezanson supported this idea · -
9 votesAdminTami Ezra (Admin, Ex Libris) responded
Removing the "accepted" status so that institution can continue voting as agreed with the PWG.
maureen.bezanson supported this idea ·
Additionally, we use the Public & Academic engagement fields in the researcher record to record who is available for supervision, yet there is no option for this information to be displayed anywhere.