Esploro

Your feedback matters to us. Help us improve Esploro by telling us what you’d like to see using the message areas below. You can also can support something already posted.

We would love to be able to respond to every idea that is submitted, but this is not feasible. We are, however, committed to responding to the most popular ideas—those that have received the most points.

For more information please review our FAQ and guidelines. Thank you.


  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Add ability to change asset type from author matching review screen OR in editing provisional asset details screen

    When approving Smart Harvest matches in the client, sometimes it is easy to tell that an asset is not a journal article, etc. For example if the title has the word Comment or Abstract as part of the title.

    Right now you must approve the match and exit author matching to update asset type. This is not efficient, and I often forget to update these.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Smart Harvesting  ·  Admin →
  2. Add ability to send list of unapproved Smart Harvest matches to confirm

    Sometimes it is impossible to confirm Smart Harvest results unless you have a current CV or publication list.

    We would like to be able to send lists of unapproved Smart Harvest results to individual researchers to confirm or reject.

    Initially, we would like to just send an email to researchers. Eventually, we would like them to be able to mark confirm/reject and reply and the Smart Harvest list would update.

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Smart Harvesting  ·  Admin →
  3. Add DOI/No DOI as a Facet to Smart Harvest author matching

    Articles with DOIs are easier to verify because you can click the DOI and review the published version of record.

    We would like a "has DOI" and "NO DOI" facet because this would speed up Smart Harvest author matching, and potentially allow lower-level staff to review.

    Staff could review "has DOI" matching and check the published version to verify affiliation. Records requiring more review or investigation could be left for higher-level staff.

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  4. Add research topics at "add researcher" step within record

    When a researcher is incorrectly matched, we often have to create a new non-affiliated one in the record. We can add their affiliation, but we can't add research topics. If the name is common, we have to look them up by researcher and add the research topics.

    It would be more efficient to add research topics (as keywords) during this step.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Smart Harvesting  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base