Katie Brady
My feedback
11 results found
-
82 votesKatie Brady
supported this idea
·
-
81 votesKatie Brady
supported this idea
·
-
143 votesKatie Brady
supported this idea
·
-
40 votesKatie Brady
supported this idea
·
-
46 votesKatie Brady
supported this idea
·
-
42 votesKatie Brady
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
88 votesKatie Brady
supported this idea
·
-
35 votesKatie Brady
supported this idea
·
-
25 votesKatie Brady
supported this idea
·
-
204 votes
Hi Elizabeth, Katie, and everyone,
Thanks so much for sharing this idea!
From what I understand, it includes two main parts:
- Allowing institutions to edit the list of values in various fields, with a specific example being the “Implemented Authorization Method” field.
- Adding more fields and making them reportable in Analytics, along with a request for a flexible mechanism to support this.
Regarding the second point — adding a flexible mechanism is quite a complex change and could impact the timeline.
If you can point out around three specific fields that are most important to add first, it might be easier.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!
Thanks again,
Tamar
An error occurred while saving the comment Katie Brady
commented
agreed, high priority. Thank you for writing all that out; it's a much nicer description of what I was aiming at with this idea:
Katie Brady
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Katie Brady
commented
The default options in the Implemented Authorization Method do not encompass the categories we need and are not directly customizable by customer. Currently we must open a ticket with Ex Libris to do this. We would like to be able to control what shows in the dropdown and what order options appear.
-
15 votesKatie Brady
supported this idea
·
.png){kind=link}
an alternative would be for the linking parameter to be associated with the interface rather than individual collections. this way it could be set in just one place.