Marina
My feedback
13 results found
-
58 votesMarina supported this idea ·
-
18 votesMarina supported this idea ·
-
77 votesMarina supported this idea ·
-
23 votesMarina supported this idea ·
-
142 votesMarina supported this idea ·
-
135 votesMarina supported this idea ·
-
209 votesMarina supported this idea ·Marina shared this idea ·
-
126 votesMarina supported this idea ·
-
55 votesMarina supported this idea ·
-
344 votes
Dear all, we are currently working on a design concept for a new form interface option for cataloging, which will make it easier to navigate long fields and subfields - we will take this request into account as part of this design. See our "Form Editing for MARC 21 Bibliographic Records" roadmap plans for more information: https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Materials/010Roadmap/Alma_Roadmap_Highlights_(2024-2025)/Metadata_Management#Form_Editing_for_MARC_21_Bibliographic_Records
Marina supported this idea · -
545 votes
Dear community, as part of the ongoing UX improvements in Alma, the "Receive new material" screen (aka Receiving WB) is planned to be refactored and support the need described in this idea. For more information see Alma roadmap:
Thanks,
Noam Fass | Alma product team
Marina supported this idea · -
138 votesMarina supported this idea ·
-
190 votes
Dear community,
Thank you for raising this idea.
I would like to better understand the use case here:
1 How often such check is done? if this is a "cleanup" that is done once in a few month, for example, perhaps an analytics report would be sufficient?
2 In the description you wrote about the "has inventory" index. Can you give more details, why it is not useful for the described use case?
Thanks,
Tamar Fuches
Alma product team
Marina supported this idea ·