My feedback

4 results found

1. More easily edit/delete POL templates

   166 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   6 comments  ·  Alma » Acquisition - PO & POLine  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Jelena Perrin supported this idea  ·  May 02, 2024

2. Add fund name to communication letter and po line claim letter

   44 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   2 comments  ·  Alma » Acquisition - PO & POLine  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Jelena Perrin supported this idea  ·  April 29, 2024

3. Quotation marks: align the behavior of Alma and CDI records

   11 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   3 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Jelena Perrin supported this idea  ·  April 10, 2024

4. Allow patrons to disable FRBR + disable FRBR in advanced search

   114 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   19 comments  ·  Primo » User Functionality  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Under Review  ·  AdminNili Natan (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

   Thank you for posting this idea. We are considering to have a new toggle 

   ""group versions together"  where users can choose to if to have search results grouped by versions or turn it off.  

   An error occurred while saving the comment
   Jelena Perrin commented  ·  January 23, 2024  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…

   FRBR Versioning often works poorly for legal documents and regularly leads to problems with customers on a daily basis.
   The main problem is that different editions are arbitrarily merged together, leading to confusing searches.
   Example:
   https://ubbern.swisscovery.slsp.ch/discovery/search?query=any,contains,verbrechenslehre%20strafrecht%20andreas%20donatsch&tab=LibraryCatalog&search_scope=MyInstitution&vid=41SLSP_UBE:UBE&offset=0

   At the Law Library Bern, University Libraries Bern, we would like versioning to be switched off and only switched on by customers when required.

   Save Submitting...
   Jelena Perrin supported this idea  ·  January 22, 2024