Skip to content

Henry Steele

My feedback

13 results found

  1. 79 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Henry Steele supported this idea  · 
  2. 175 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Henry Steele supported this idea  · 
  3. 167 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    The 'Claimed Returned' action will be available for lost loans. It will change the loan status to 'claimed returned'.

    A customer parameter will determine whether the change to claimed returned should trigger a 'Find Item' action (and refund the lost item fees) + change to 'claim return', or only change to 'claim return'.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Henry Steele commented  · 

    The problem we have with claimed returned is that something can’t have a claimed return status, and then also another process type like being on a search work order. This limits our ability to use the claimed return status, because in most all cases it would be searched for afterwards.

    Would addressing the larger problem mentioned in this enhancement also address the issue I've described?

  4. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Henry Steele shared this idea  · 
  5. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Henry Steele shared this idea  · 
  6. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Henry Steele shared this idea  · 
  7. 262 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Henry Steele commented  · 

    I wanted to add some comments to this. I believe (?) Ex Libris developed something along this line where you can create a separate user for a proxy that would log into Primo differently. And obviously be a different account to check out items on behalf of faculty. But we don't think this is ideal, because it splits a single patron's acvitivty , the proxy, into two records which could create confusion.

    So we'd like it if Ex Libris developed this along the original lines laid out in the idea exchange enhancement here, at https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/16742482-add-expiry-date-for-proxy-for-users

  8. 273 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Henry Steele commented  · 

    What is the status of this planned enhancement? The last update to this item was October of 2018

  9. 220 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Henry Steele commented  · 

    This is a great idea, and I think is important for bulk due dates to work properly. If possible it might be good to make this a toggle feature, like a check box that says "override expiration dates?"

    Henry Steele supported this idea  · 
  10. 30 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Henry Steele shared this idea  · 
  11. 123 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Henry Steele supported this idea  · 
  12. 187 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Henry Steele supported this idea  · 
  13. 218 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    The core user record will  have a field for selecting a preferred pronoun. The options will be from a configurable drop down such as:

    • he, him, his
    • she,her,hers


    The field will  be updatable from:

    • Alma form
    • SIS
    • API
    • Primo (VE)


    The preferred pronoun will in the Manage Fulfillment Options screen.


    It will be possible to locally override this field without overriding from the SIS, like other fields allow (such as user group).

    Henry Steele supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base