Michael Cohen (UW-Madison)
My feedback
9 results found
-
179 votesMichael Cohen (UW-Madison)
supported this idea
·
-
24 votesMichael Cohen (UW-Madison)
supported this idea
·
-
40 votes
Dear all,
We are looking into adding the MMS ID for more sets. As the MMS ID identifies a bib record, including it for title sets makes sense - and we are planning to add this option to physical titles sets.
However, regarding physical items sets, the set entity is the item, while the MMS ID is part of the metadata of the bibliographic record - which limits our ability to use it when creating a set of physical items, as it is not an identifier of the item.
Michael Cohen (UW-Madison)
shared this idea
·
-
83 votesMichael Cohen (UW-Madison)
shared this idea
·
-
12 votesMichael Cohen (UW-Madison)
shared this idea
·
-
3 votesMichael Cohen (UW-Madison)
shared this idea
·
-
188 votes
Thank you for this ideas exchange request.
For the purpose of clarification:
Alma uses (among others) two levels of faceting the bibliographic records: Material type and Resource type.Regarding the Material Type: There are seven different distinct bibliographic material types in Alma, and this corresponds to the seven different distinct bibliographic material types used by the MARC standard. These MARC standards are explained at https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bdintro.html under section “Scope of the Bibliographic Format”. Ex Libris will leave these distinct seven formats, and not add or subtract from them. This is because there are seven distinct formats in the MARC standard. For this reason we will not add another format or change the name of an existing format. Each bibliographic record has one bibliographic material type. The Material Type is considered “Music” if the LDR pos. 6 is one of the following: c d i j. This is explained in the Ex…
Michael Cohen (UW-Madison)
shared this idea
·
-
73 votesMichael Cohen (UW-Madison)
shared this idea
·
-
10 votesMichael Cohen (UW-Madison)
shared this idea
·
